On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:58:49 +
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 06:43 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:01:10 +
> > "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" wrote:
> [...]
> > > Meantime
> > > I'll investigate the kprobes test failures I see (which actually looks
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 06:43 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:01:10 +
> "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" wrote:
[...]
> > Meantime
> > I'll investigate the kprobes test failures I see (which actually looks
> > like cache/TLB issues and not test code problems after all).
>
> OK, btw
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:01:10 +
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:27 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 2nd version of the patches which improve kprobe
> > on arm implementation (a kind of bugfix). Version 1 is here;
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:27 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 2nd version of the patches which improve kprobe
> on arm implementation (a kind of bugfix). Version 1 is here;
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/538
>
> In this version I didn't update the code, just update the
>
Hi,
Here is the 2nd version of the patches which improve kprobe
on arm implementation (a kind of bugfix). Version 1 is here;
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/538
In this version I didn't update the code, just update the
patch description according to Tixy's comment and add his Ack.
Thank you,
-
5 matches
Mail list logo