Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-20 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Dave Young schrieb: >> Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference >> at virtual address 0008 >> Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 printing eip: c01b2db6 *pde = >> Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Oops: [#1] PREEMPT >> Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 Modules linked in: ppp_defl

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-20 Thread Dave Young
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:49:58PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Saturday 16 February 2008, Dave Young wrote: > > Hi, alon > > > > Please try the attached patch, hope it fixes your problem. > > > > Regards > > dave > > Does not work... :( > > Alon. > > Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 usb 3-1: configur

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-16 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Dave Young wrote: > Hi, alon > > Please try the attached patch, hope it fixes your problem. > > Regards > dave Does not work... :( Alon. Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 usb 3-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Feb 16 23:41:33 alon1 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL po

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-15 Thread Dave Young
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Morton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:54 +0200 Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-14 Thread Dave Young
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:54 +0200 Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > sorry for rep

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-13 Thread Mark Lord
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:54 +0200 Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, sorry for reply again, this seems a diffrent issue ... All that I do is running pppd over the

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:54 +0200 Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > sorry for reply again, this seems a diffrent issue ... > > > > All that I do is running pppd over the

Re: [BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-11 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
Hello Alon, On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: [...] > Feb 11 17:46:05 alon1 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference > at virtual address 0008 > Feb 11 17:46:05 alon1 printing eip: c01b2da6 *pde = > Feb 11 17:46:05 alon1 Oops: [#1] PREEM

[BUG] rfcomm

2008-02-11 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry for reply again, this seems a diffrent issue ... > > All that I do is running pppd over the rfcomm, suspending the system and > resume. > I don't load any binary module. > > Alo

Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-11-05 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > sorry for reply again, this seems a diffrent issue ... All that I do is running pppd over the rfcomm, suspending the system and resume. I don't load any binary module. Alon. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux

Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-11-05 Thread Dave Young
On 11/6/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/5/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/5/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I managed to produce this bug last weekend. I debugged it and found a > > > rfcomm_dev refcnt BUG. > > > please try the patch

Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-11-05 Thread Dave Young
On 11/5/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/5/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I managed to produce this bug last weekend. I debugged it and found a > > rfcomm_dev refcnt BUG. > > please try the patch of attachment, sorry for attachement because of > > my gmail/

Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-11-05 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 11/5/07, Dave Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I managed to produce this bug last weekend. I debugged it and found a > rfcomm_dev refcnt BUG. > please try the patch of attachment, sorry for attachement because of > my gmail/mutt configuration problem. > > I post it in below thread: > htt

Re: [Bluez-devel] [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-11-04 Thread Dave Young
On 10/24/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have this issue for long time (At least from linux-2.6.18). > I think it is about time I report this... :) > > When coming out of suspend (uswsusp or suspend2) if rfcomm was > active it creates this dump. > > If you need any more

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-24 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2007-10-23 20:28:04, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > actually uswsusp has been upstream for quite some time already. See > > > Documentation/power/userland-swsusp.txt > > nice. I've never used it. Currently I am using what comes with Ubuntu > > 7.10

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-24 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:55:54 +0200, "Alon Bar-Lev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the code in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c contains two calls to > > device_move(). Please comment these out and try again. At least then we > > know that it is i

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:57, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > first of all, please check if this still happens with 2.6.23, because we > > had some patches in the area of the RFCOMM TTY code that might have > > fixed this. > > These messages a

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the code in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c contains two calls to > device_move(). Please comment these out and try again. At least then we > know that it is in issue on how we use the driver model. No bugs... Looks OK, although I don't know wha

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > still another one to go :( Anyway since you have experience and you have > a way to reproduce it, please test the latest kernel from Linus' Git > tree. I can reproduce this. But I cannot use git snapshot as I have too much dependencies. >

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Alon, > > nice. I've never used it. Currently I am using what comes with Ubuntu > > 7.10 and that seems to work. > > Have you tried to suspend while pppd is using rfcomm? > > The fact that it happens with suspend2 and uswsusp means that the > issue is suspend blind. > Do you need any more inf

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nice. I've never used it. Currently I am using what comes with Ubuntu > 7.10 and that seems to work. Have you tried to suspend while pppd is using rfcomm? The fact that it happens with suspend2 and uswsusp means that the issue is suspend b

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > actually uswsusp has been upstream for quite some time already. See > > Documentation/power/userland-swsusp.txt > nice. I've never used it. Currently I am using what comes with Ubuntu > 7.10 and that seems to work. Never used ubuntu, so I have no i

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Alon, > > first of all, please check if this still happens with 2.6.23, because we > > had some patches in the area of the RFCOMM TTY code that might have > > fixed this. > > These messages are of 2.6.23. still another one to go :( Anyway since you have experience and you have a way to reprod

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Jiri, > > Second, can you try without uswsusp or suspend2. Both of them are not > > upstream and I can't tell how much these would effect this kind of > > behavior. > > Hi Marcel, > > actually uswsusp has been upstream for quite some time already. See > Documentation/power/userland-swsusp.

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Second, can you try without uswsusp or suspend2. Both of them are not > upstream and I can't tell how much these would effect this kind of > behavior. Hi Marcel, actually uswsusp has been upstream for quite some time already. See Documentation/pow

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > first of all, please check if this still happens with 2.6.23, because we > had some patches in the area of the RFCOMM TTY code that might have > fixed this. These messages are of 2.6.23. > Second, can you try without uswsusp or suspend2. B

Re: [BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Alon, > I have this issue for long time (At least from linux-2.6.18). > I think it is about time I report this... :) > > When coming out of suspend (uswsusp or suspend2) if rfcomm was > active it creates this dump. > > If you need any more info I will be glad to provide. first of all, please

[BUG] rfcomm]

2007-10-23 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I have this issue for long time (At least from linux-2.6.18). I think it is about time I report this... :) When coming out of suspend (uswsusp or suspend2) if rfcomm was active it creates this dump. If you need any more info I will be glad to provide. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. --- O