Hi Jiri,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:34:57AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> $ perf report -s pid,cpu --stdio --hierarchy
>> #
>> #Overhead Pid:Command / CPU
>> # ... ...
>> #
>> 31.21%
> If not, I suggest to use --hierarchy mode with including the sort key
> as the first one. In this case. It'll still show absolute
> percentages of global total period, but you can see the desired result
> easily IMHO. Please try something like this:
>
> $ perf report --hierarchy -s pid,cpu
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:34:57AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
> $ perf report -s pid,cpu --stdio --hierarchy
> #
> #Overhead Pid:Command / CPU
> # ... ...
> #
> 31.21% 0:swapper
> 12.16% 000
> 3.09% 001
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:22:29PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Ar
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> >> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -07
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> >> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >> >
>
Hi Arnaldo and Stephane,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf report.
>>
>> I do a system-wide collection a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> > Hi Arnaldo,
>> >
>> > I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf
>>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:37:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf report.
> >
> > I do a system-wide collection and then I wa
Em Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf report.
>
> I do a system-wide collection and then I want to narrow down the
> reporting to a specific process:
>
> $ perf record -a -e cycl
Hi Arnaldo,
I ran into an issue trying to use the --pid filtering option of perf report.
I do a system-wide collection and then I want to narrow down the
reporting to a specific process:
$ perf record -a -e cycles:pp sleep 10
$ perf report --sort cpu,comm --pid X
Where X is a process sampled du
11 matches
Mail list logo