Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-29 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
On 11/29/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > > > The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and > > that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying > > that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is n

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-29 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Mark Lord wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > > > >> The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and > >> that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying > >> that should work and worked under

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-29 Thread Mark Lord
Alan Stern wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently is the ability to unplug

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-29 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and > that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying > that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently > is the ability to unplug and plug bac

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-29 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
The feature does work as long as the device remains plugged in and that is what I have said in my previous postings too. What I'm saying that should work and worked under 2.6.21 and is not working currently is the ability to unplug and plug back in the device while the computer is suspended before

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Here's what I got after compiling kernel with CONFIG_USB_PERSIST and > CONFIG_USB_DEBUG both enabled. The attached files are: > > config - shows the .config file used when compiling kernel 2.6.23.9 > > sysandmount.txt - shows mounts a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-26 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > > Wait a minute. You're saying that USB Persist worked under 2.6.21 > > because it wasn't available? That makes no sense. Besides, if you > > don't like USB Persist under 2.6.23, you can always eliminate it by > > turning off CONFIG_USB_PERSIST.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-26 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
Thanks for responding Alan. On 11/26/07, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > > > The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no > > way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the > > computer which is sus

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-26 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no > way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the > computer which is suspended. You might think so at first. But suppose another device of the same type got p

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-25 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
The device which has the root fs is a READ-ONLY device. There is no way for it to change between getting detached and reattached to the computer which is suspended. In such a case there is no possibility of hibernation because there is nothing to write back to. I understand that this is currently

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-25 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:04:32 -0700 "Raymano Garibaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Is there any other information that I can provide which might help in > > resolving this bug? > > Let's cc the USB developers. > > > On 11/18/07, Raymano Gariba

Re: [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:04:32 -0700 "Raymano Garibaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any other information that I can provide which might help in > resolving this bug? Let's cc the USB developers. > On 11/18/07, Raymano Garibaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The last time I tried this

Re: [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-20 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
Is there any other information that I can provide which might help in resolving this bug? On 11/18/07, Raymano Garibaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The last time I tried this and it worked was 2.6.21. Below is a > portion of the kernel log file where I had a USB storage device > attached to the

Re: [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-18 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
The last time I tried this and it worked was 2.6.21. Below is a portion of the kernel log file where I had a USB storage device attached to the computer, then suspended the computer, while computer was suspended detached and reattached the USB storage device, and resumed the computer.

Re: [BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-18 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sunday 18 November 2007 20:14, Raymano Garibaldi wrote: > In kernel 2.6.23.8 USB_PERSIST feature does not work if the same USB > device is detached and reattached while computer is suspended. The > mount points for the USB storage device mounted before suspend are > lost and the device has to be

[BUG] USB_PERSIST

2007-11-18 Thread Raymano Garibaldi
In kernel 2.6.23.8 USB_PERSIST feature does not work if the same USB device is detached and reattached while computer is suspended. The mount points for the USB storage device mounted before suspend are lost and the device has to be remounted after resume. Please advise, Thank you, Raymano Garibal