Re: [BK] cvs export

Hi! On Tue 01-03-05 17:14:19, Larry McVoy wrote: > A while back someone complained about the CVS exporter because it > sometimes groups a pile of BK changesets into one commit. That's true, > it does. > > I've been running tests over the BK tree and I think we can do better. > Here's the scoop:

Re: [BK] cvs export

Hi Larry, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry McVoy) wrote: > One problem is that the set of files in patches may not be disjoint, > the same file may participate in multiple patches. I think we can handle > that in the following way, we put multiple comments, one for each patch, > so you'd see > > (L

Re: [BK] cvs export

On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:14:19PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > A while back someone complained about the CVS exporter because it > sometimes groups a pile of BK changesets into one commit. That's true, > it does. I guess that this someone was me... > I've been running tests over the BK tree and

[BK] cvs export

A while back someone complained about the CVS exporter because it sometimes groups a pile of BK changesets into one commit. That's true, it does. I've been running tests over the BK tree and I think we can do better. Here's the scoop: when we do an export we are going from a very bushy graph stru