GCC 2.95 will NOT compile a 2.0 series kernel...
Gerhard
> # gcc --version
> 2.95.2
>
> # uname -a
> Linux eyal 2.4.0-ac3 #1 Sun Jan 7 12:15:50 EST 2001 i686 unknown
>
> # ls -l /lib/libc-*.so
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1057576 Oct 14 05:45
> /lib/libc-2.1.95.so
>
> --
> Eya
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:27:44 +1100,
> Eyal Lebedinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >My 'make dep' fails in the following way. This is on Debian 2.2, I
> >commented
> >if [ -n "amigamouse.c atarimouse.c atixlmouse.c baycom.c busmouse.c
> >cd1865.h conmakehash.c console.c con
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:27:44 +1100,
Eyal Lebedinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My 'make dep' fails in the following way. This is on Debian 2.2, I
>commented
>if [ -n "amigamouse.c atarimouse.c atixlmouse.c baycom.c busmouse.c
>cd1865.h conmakehash.c console.c console_struct.h consolemap.c
>conso
My 'make dep' fails in the following way. This is on Debian 2.2, I
commented
out the warnings/errors in linux/include/linux/types.h re the compiler
version.
gcc -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o
scripts/mkdep scripts/mkdep.c
make[1]: Entering directory
`/data2/usr/local/
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:01:07PM -0800, Ivan Passos wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> > Everyone laughs, I guess. The 2.0.39final didn't became the final
> > release (could've told you so...) The good thing? Well, some bugs were
> > found and removed. But this is it. En
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David Weinehall wrote:
> Everyone laughs, I guess. The 2.0.39final didn't became the final
> release (could've told you so...) The good thing? Well, some bugs were
> found and removed. But this is it. Enjoy!
Well, where is it?? :)
I tried ftp.us.kernel.org, but couldn't f
Everyone laughs, I guess. The 2.0.39final didn't became the final
release (could've told you so...) The good thing? Well, some bugs were
found and removed. But this is it. Enjoy!
Changelog for v2.0.39
o Fix memory-leak in af_unix (Jon Nelson,
7 matches
Mail list logo
