On Tuesday 12 February 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:42:20 -0500
>
> > The kernel is actually worse, because the set/get macros are more
> > complex. Some live in ctree.h like in the progs, but the nasty ones live
> > in struct-funcs.c
From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:42:20 -0500
> The kernel is actually worse, because the set/get macros are more complex.
> Some live in ctree.h like in the progs, but the nasty ones live in
> struct-funcs.c
This is really problematic, because you've got these th
On Sunday 10 February 2008, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:00:13 -0500
>
> This function never returns an error, so the simplest fix was to
> return the hash value which avoids all of the issues. In attempting
> other schemes to fix this, I f
From: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:00:13 -0500
> So, here's v0.12.
I couldn't even make a filesystem on sparc64 without the following
patch.
The first problem is that these SETGET macros lose typing information,
and therefore can't see the 'packed' attribute and there
Hello everyone,
I wasn't planning on releasing v0.12 yet, and it was supposed to have some
initial support for multiple devices. But, I have made a number of
performance fixes and small bug fixes, and I wanted to get them out there
before the (destabilizing) work on multiple-devices took over.
5 matches
Mail list logo
