On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:53:58 -0600
Clark Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:47:08 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > - There is a useless rcu_bh thread which has been deactivated.
> >
>
> For some strange reason I had RCU_TORTURE_TEST defined in my config. This
> caused m
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:47:08 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> - There is a useless rcu_bh thread which has been deactivated.
>
For some strange reason I had RCU_TORTURE_TEST defined in my config. This
caused my compile to blow up because kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c wanted to test the
(now
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:25 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 00:47 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > Known issues:
> > - bcache stays disabled
> >
> > - CPU hotplug got a little better but can deadlock.
>
> My x86_64 desktop box survived 100 iterations of Stev
On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 00:47 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Known issues:
> - bcache stays disabled
>
> - CPU hotplug got a little better but can deadlock.
My x86_64 desktop box survived 100 iterations of Steven's script. If
my 64 core box survives, I'll be amazed, but it definite
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.4.1-rt6 patch set.
Changes since v4.4.1-rt5:
- The rtmutex wait_lock is taken with interrupts disabled again. It
fixes a possible deadlock in the posix timer code. Patch by Thomas
Gleixner.
- Don't disable interrupts around atomic_dec_and_lock()
5 matches
Mail list logo