On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:12:02 +0530
Abhay Sachan wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have installed 3.10.6 kernel on my HP laptop. I keep getting this message
> in dmesg after a few hours of usage. I was getting the similar messages in
> stable-3.9 too.
So this is with vanilla 3.10.6 and not the -rt version?
>
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use them
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:14:15 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 03:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Looking at it more, I can now see why they did what they did.
>
> He is the only user in the whole kernel. It is somehow hard to believe
> that it can't be solved differently.
On 08/20/2013 03:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Looking at it more, I can now see why they did what they did.
He is the only user in the whole kernel. It is somehow hard to believe
that it can't be solved differently.
> -- Steve
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:29:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
>
> > > The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
> > > just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
> > > definit
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use the
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
> > just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
> > definition says that it is wrong to use them and completion is the
> > right way
On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> Dear RT folks!
>>>
>>> I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
>>
>> I'm getting this when trying to buil
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Dear RT folks!
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
>
> I'm getting this when trying to build:
>
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cach
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
I'm getting this when trying to build:
drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit declarati
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Carsten Emde wrote:
> > On 08/13/2013 02:47 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm behind on 3.4-rt, 3.2-rt and of course 3.0-rt. Hopefully,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Carsten Emde wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 02:47 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I'm behind on 3.4-rt, 3.2-rt and of course 3.0-rt. Hopefully, I'll get
> > > them all out this week.
> >
> > I expect that the 3.10-rt kernel w
On 08/13/2013 02:47 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:34:13 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
Does this mean that I can drop 3.6-rt in favor of 3.8-
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:47:18 -0400
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:34:13 +0200
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> >> Dear RT folks!
> >>
> >> I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
> >
> >
> > Does thi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:34:13 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
>> Dear RT folks!
>>
>> I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
>
>
> Does this mean that I can drop 3.6-rt in favor of 3.8-rt?
I'd guess that the trade-off
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:34:13 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
Does this mean that I can drop 3.6-rt in favor of 3.8-rt?
I'm just about finished with a 3.6 stable, which I'll finish, add -rt
to it, and then call it "
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
Changes since v3.10.6-rt2
- the queue can be imported with git quiltimport
- powerpc compiles again. Thanks to Paul Gortmaker for the patch.
- added three patches from v3.8 which fall the wagon on their way to
3.10. One of them e
18 matches
Mail list logo