On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:28:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > All I see in dmesg are occasional ooms which kill random trinity
> > > childs.
> >
> > hm, that sounds odd. if it's only fuzzing futex, it shouldn't be
> > doing much memory allocation.
>
> It has a fast memory leak
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:08:02PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > I twisted my brain around that for a fricking long time, but I really
> > can't see the failure in the code.
> >
> > Neither did I succeed to trigger the issue in a VM (with and wi
B1;3202;0cOn Fri, 2 May 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > This is trickier to reproduce than it first seemed, as logging slows
> > > things down so much. But after a few hours, it logged th
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> > This is trickier to reproduce than it first seemed, as logging slows
> > things down so much. But after a few hours, it logged that the
> > call that triggered this was..
> >
> > fu
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> This is trickier to reproduce than it first seemed, as logging slows
> things down so much. But after a few hours, it logged that the
> call that triggered this was..
>
> futex(uaddr=0x7f55ff8c4000, op=0x6, val=0x20006223800b,
> utime=0x7f55ff8c4000,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 20:14 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > futex(uaddr=0x7f55ff8c4000, op=0x6, val=0x20006223800b,
> > utime=0x7f55ff8c4000, uaddr2=0x7f55ff8c4000, val3=-123)
>
> Perhaps because of chance. Even for pi futexes, if the lock is
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:24:30PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > futex(uaddr=0x7f55ff8c4000, op=0x6, val=0x20006223800b,
> > utime=0x7f55ff8c4000, uaddr2=0x7f55ff8c4000, val3=-123)
>
> Perhaps because of chance. Even for pi futexes, if the lock is
> uncontended, the kernel will neve
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 20:14 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:16:55AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Just hit this while fuzzing the futex() syscall.
> >
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6202 at kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c:151
> debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock+0x4e/0x60()
> > D
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:16:55AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Just hit this while fuzzing the futex() syscall.
>
>
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6202 at kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c:151
> debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock+0x4e/0x60()
> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!rt_mutex_owner(lock))
> Modules linked in:
Just hit this while fuzzing the futex() syscall.
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6202 at kernel/locking/rtmutex-debug.c:151
debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock+0x4e/0x60()
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!rt_mutex_owner(lock))
Modules linked in:
tun fuse ipt_ULOG nfnetlink bnep can_bcm scsi_transport_iscsi nfc caif_socket
c
10 matches
Mail list logo