On Monday 25 July 2005 12:27, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Christian Hesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050723 05:51]:
> > On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> > > actually makes a noticeable diffe
* Christian Hesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050723 05:51]:
> On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't
> > have hard number
On Sunday 24 July 2005 16:23, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I
> > > don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3
> > > hours i
Hi!
> > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't
> > have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get
> > out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use
On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't
> have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get
> out of
Hello,
I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't
have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out
of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern a
6 matches
Mail list logo
