Re: [2.6 patch] re-add required code to include/asm-v850/unistd.h

2007-07-12 Thread Miles Bader
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just open-code the contents of these >> macros in the place where they are used? >> >> Even better probably would be to convert the v850 kernel_thread code >> to call do_fork directly, like most other architectures do. >

Re: [2.6 patch] re-add required code to include/asm-v850/unistd.h

2007-07-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 11:41:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 07 July 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Commit f5738ceed46782aea7663d62cb6398eb05fc4ce0 removed a bit too much, > > resulting in the following compile error: > > Sorry about the trouble this has caused you. No problem

Re: [2.6 patch] re-add required code to include/asm-v850/unistd.h

2007-07-07 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 07 July 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Commit f5738ceed46782aea7663d62cb6398eb05fc4ce0 removed a bit too much, > resulting in the following compile error: Sorry about the trouble this has caused you. >  #ifdef __KERNEL__ >   > +/* Syscall protocol: > +   Syscall number in r12, args in

[2.6 patch] re-add required code to include/asm-v850/unistd.h

2007-07-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Commit f5738ceed46782aea7663d62cb6398eb05fc4ce0 removed a bit too much, resulting in the following compile error: <-- snip --> ... CC arch/v850/kernel/process.o /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/v850/kernel/process.c: In function 'kernel_thread': /home/bunk/linux/ke