On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:56:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [ this time with a better subject ]
> >
> > "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> Isn't 'extern inline' an old gcc trick to force inlining? (
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ this time with a better subject ]
>
> "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Isn't 'extern inline' an old gcc trick to force inlining? (instead of
just hinting)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:44:43AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks Adrian - I've committed it to my tree.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.
[ this time with a better subject ]
"extern inline" doesn't make sense.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm1-full/fs/adfs/adfs.h.old2005-08-19
23:21:33.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm1-full/fs/adfs/adfs.h2005-08-19 23:22:07.0
+020
4 matches
Mail list logo