* Roman Zippel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What's wrong with a normal dependency?
Trying to enable when SYSFS under fs->pseudo->fs but security is under
security-> is just confusing, with no obvious (user perspective)
dependency.
> Please don't abuse select, use it only if you really have to.
O
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > config SECURITY
> > bool "Enable different security models"
> > + depends on SYSFS
>
> Hmm, what about select instead?
What's wrong with a normal dependency?
Please don't abuse select, use it only
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:30:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > config SECURITY
> > bool "Enable different security models"
> > + depends on SYSFS
>
> Hmm, what about select instead?
I have no strong opinion on this, especially since this is onl
CONFIG_SECURITY=y and CONFIG_SYSFS=n results in the following compile
error:
<-- snip -->
...
LD vmlinux
security/built-in.o: In function `securityfs_init':
inode.c:(.init.text+0x1c2): undefined reference to `kernel_subsys'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Ad
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> config SECURITY
> bool "Enable different security models"
> + depends on SYSFS
Hmm, what about select instead?
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTE
CONFIG_SECURITY=y and CONFIG_SYSFS=n results in the following compile
error:
<-- snip -->
...
LD vmlinux
security/built-in.o: In function `securityfs_init':
inode.c:(.init.text+0x1c2): undefined reference to `kernel_subsys'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Ad
6 matches
Mail list logo
