On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 03:15:04PM -0400, Ricky Beam wrote:
> PS: I really hate it when people break "functional" things in the "stable"
> tree. (functional and stable are both open to debate.)
I was under the impression that it really wasn't functional.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life
>Actually, it broke at 2.4.3. Go look at the first change to buz.c from
>that patch.
None at all. It didn't break at 2.4.3, it just didn't compile at all anymore
in 2.4.3. It was already kind of broken before that.
>PS: I really hate it when people break "functional" things in the >"stable"
>tr
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Jan Sembera wrote:
>i've got a problem compiling drivers/media/video/buz.c as module. When
>i'm trying to compile, i get couple of errors:
...
Actually, it broke at 2.4.3. Go look at the first change to buz.c from
that patch.
--Ricky
PS: I really hate it when people break
Hi,
i've got a problem compiling drivers/media/video/buz.c as module. When
i'm trying to compile, i get couple of errors:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=athlon -DMODUL
4 matches
Mail list logo