Before of all I want to publicly apologize with Richard as never my
intention was to exacerbate him.
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:20PM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> > asm/io.h uses out of line function only when CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC is
> > defined, otherwise it uses (take writel as an exa
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:20PM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> asm/io.h uses out of line function only when CONFIG_ALPHA_GENERIC is
> defined, otherwise it uses (take writel as an example) __raw_writel that
> IMHO need to be defined in core_t2.h.
Perhaps you should _show_ an actual failure rat
Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:04:07PM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> > ... the only missing things from core_t2.h are some defines to
> > permit to it to work when CONFIG_ALPHA_T2 is defined.
>
> Have you tried it? I did. It works fine.
>
> What _is_ defined in asm/c
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:04:07PM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> ... the only missing things from core_t2.h are some defines to
> permit to it to work when CONFIG_ALPHA_T2 is defined.
Have you tried it? I did. It works fine.
What _is_ defined in asm/core_t2.h is enough for alpha/lib/io.c to
d
Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> > And this would be the only core_*.h files where this intention is
> > expressed?
>
> Not at all. See core_lca.h, jensen.h, core_cia.h, core_mcpcia.h.
I think you're confusing the issues: the only m
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> And this would be the only core_*.h files where this intention is
> expressed?
Not at all. See core_lca.h, jensen.h, core_cia.h, core_mcpcia.h.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:43:00AM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> > alpha-mb-2.4.diff add missing defines from core_t2.h for non generic
> > kernel (against 2.4.0test11)
>
> These are not "missing". They are intentionally not present
> so that stuff will be done out
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:43:00AM +0100, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> alpha-mb-2.4.diff add missing defines from core_t2.h for non generic
> kernel (against 2.4.0test11)
These are not "missing". They are intentionally not present
so that stuff will be done out of line.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from thi
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> Gérard Roudier wrote:
> >
> >
> > Based on that, let me claim that most of blind barriers inserted this way
> > are useless (thus sob-optimal) and may band-aid useful barriers that are
> > missing. The result is subtle bugs, hidden most of the time,
Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
>
> Based on that, let me claim that most of blind barriers inserted this way
> are useless (thus sob-optimal) and may band-aid useful barriers that are
> missing. The result is subtle bugs, hidden most of the time, that we will
> have to suffer for decades.
>
> The only
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
>
> Here you are two patches:
>
> alpha-mb-2.2.diff add the missing mb() to the cores that still lack it
> (against 2.2.18pre25)
>
> alpha-mb-2.4.diff add missing defines from core_t2.h for non generic
> kernel (against 2.4.0test11)
>
> Please apply
Here you are two patches:
alpha-mb-2.2.diff add the missing mb() to the cores that still lack it
(against 2.2.18pre25)
alpha-mb-2.4.diff add missing defines from core_t2.h for non generic
kernel (against 2.4.0test11)
Please apply on your trees.
I've also noted that 2.4 uses mb() after read[bw
12 matches
Mail list logo
