Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-15 Thread Chris Wright
* Andi Kleen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > > That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further > > > > Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues. > > > >

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-15 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > > That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further > > Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues. > > > myself, and because it does address a real memory le

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-15 Thread Siddha, Suresh B
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > That said, I will be testing this patch a bit further Thanks. Let me know if you see any issues. > myself, and because it does address a real memory leak issue, we should > consider it or another fix for stable 2.6.12.4. Appende

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-15 Thread Justin M. Forbes
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > I think the patch is t

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-14 Thread Siddha, Suresh B
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > I think the patch is too risky for stable. I had even my doubts > for mainline. hmm.. Main reason

Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:05:32PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote: > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Andi Kle

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-13 Thread Horst von Brand
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Huh? Cc: in here? > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <

[11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-13 Thread Greg KH
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Suresh Siddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Appended patch will setup compatibility mode TASK_SIZE properly. This will fix atleast three known bugs that can be encountered while running compatibility mode ap

Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > I think the patch is too risky for stable. I had even my doubts > for mainline. Ok, thanks, I've

Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

2005-07-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. I think the patch is too risky for stable. I had even my doubts for mainline. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the