Re: [ 64/66] GFS2: Test bufdata with buffer locked and gfs2_log_lock held

2012-12-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:13 +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 14:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:11 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > > know. > > > > > > -

Re: [ 64/66] GFS2: Test bufdata with buffer locked and gfs2_log_lock held

2012-11-26 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 14:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:11 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > 3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Benjamin Marzinski > > > > commit 96e5d1d3adf56f1c

Re: [ 64/66] GFS2: Test bufdata with buffer locked and gfs2_log_lock held

2012-11-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:11 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Benjamin Marzinski > > commit 96e5d1d3adf56f1c7eeb07258f6a1a0a7ae9c489 upstream. > > In gfs2_trans_add_bh(), gfs2 was test

[ 64/66] GFS2: Test bufdata with buffer locked and gfs2_log_lock held

2012-11-14 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
3.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Benjamin Marzinski commit 96e5d1d3adf56f1c7eeb07258f6a1a0a7ae9c489 upstream. In gfs2_trans_add_bh(), gfs2 was testing if a there was a bd attached to the buffer without having the gfs2_log_lock