Hi Willy,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:00:57PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:07:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This commit is based on the above, with the addition of verifying
> > > > blackho
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:07:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This commit is based on the above, with the addition of verifying
> > > blackhole
> > > routes in the same manner.
> >
> > That addition doesn't seem to corresp
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:07:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This commit is based on the above, with the addition of verifying blackhole
> > routes in the same manner.
>
> That addition doesn't seem to correspond to anything in mainline. Why
> should 2.6.32 differ?
Fixing the issue with bl
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 19:24 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
>
> --
>
> From: Benjamin LaHaise
>
> commit d11a4dc18bf41719c9f0d7ed494d295dd2973b92
> Author: Timo Ters
> Date: Thu Mar 18 23:20:20
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Benjamin LaHaise
commit d11a4dc18bf41719c9f0d7ed494d295dd2973b92
Author: Timo Teräs
Date: Thu Mar 18 23:20:20 2010 +
ipv4: check rt_genid in dst_check
Xfrm_dst keeps a refe
5 matches
Mail list logo