Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 02:47:22AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: (...) > > > This seems to be working around a bug elsewhere. Has the underlying > > > bug been fixed in mainline yet? > > > > > > > Yes, the bug was fixed in: > > > > 03179fe92318e7934c180d96f12eff2cb36ef7b6 > > ext4: undo ext4_calc

Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 07:59 -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > On 10/04/2012 05:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > >> know. > >> > >> -- > >> > >>

Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-05 Thread Brian Foster
On 10/05/2012 08:37 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:59:11AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: >> On 10/04/2012 05:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please le

Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:59:11AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > On 10/04/2012 05:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > >> know. > >> > >> -- >

Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-05 Thread Brian Foster
On 10/04/2012 05:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me >> know. >> >> -- >> >> From: Brian Foster >> >> commit 97795d2a5b8d3c8dc4365d4bd340419184045

Re: [ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > -- > > From: Brian Foster > > commit 97795d2a5b8d3c8dc4365d4bd3404191840453ba upstream. > > If we hit a condition where we ha

[ 110/180] ext4: dont let i_reserved_meta_blocks go negative

2012-10-01 Thread Willy Tarreau
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Brian Foster commit 97795d2a5b8d3c8dc4365d4bd3404191840453ba upstream. If we hit a condition where we have allocated metadata blocks that were not appropriately reserved, we risk underflow