Re: formail doing weird things (was: [ 01/37] Remove easily user-triggerable BUG from generic_setlease)

2012-07-18 Thread Roland Eggner
On 2012-07-17 Tuesday at 17:14 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:02:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Greg KH > > > > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > -- > > Argh, I give up, I just can't get messag

Re: [ 01/37] Remove easily user-triggerable BUG from generic_setlease

2012-07-18 Thread Nick Bowler
Hi Greg, On 2012-07-17 17:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Argh, I give up, I just can't get message threading working properly > these days. These are the 3.4 patches, in response to the 3.0 patches, > and it took 2 tries to send them out due to formail doing wierd things. > > Sorry about this people

Re: [ 01/37] Remove easily user-triggerable BUG from generic_setlease

2012-07-17 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:02:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > From: Greg KH > > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- Argh, I give up, I just can't get message threading working properly these days. These are the 3.4 patches,

[ 01/37] Remove easily user-triggerable BUG from generic_setlease

2012-07-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Greg KH 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Dave Jones commit 8d657eb3b43861064d36241e88d9d61c709f33f0 upstream. This can be trivially triggered from userspace by passing in something unexpected. kernel BUG at fs/lo