Re: [ 00/54] 3.6.9-stable review

2012-12-02 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:11:48PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 11:58:28PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > >> At Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:55:31 -0800, > >> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > > >> > This is the start of

Re: [ 00/54] 3.6.9-stable review

2012-12-01 Thread Shuah Khan
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 11:58:28PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: >> At Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:55:31 -0800, >> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.6.9 release. >> > There are 54 patches i

Re: [ 00/54] 3.6.9-stable review

2012-12-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 11:58:28PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:55:31 -0800, > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.6.9 release. > > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one.

Re: [ 00/54] 3.6.9-stable review

2012-12-01 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:55:31 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.6.9 release. > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. >

[ 00/54] 3.6.9-stable review

2012-11-30 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.6.9 release. There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Sun Dec 2 18:51:00 UTC 2012. Anything received