On Thursday 01 February 2007 13:24, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> if resolution is an issue then i can improve this thing to be based off
> a separate /optional/ hrtimer, thus if it's enabled it could enable 1000
> Hz (and not 1024 Hz) update for the variable. The update resolution
> could be tuned via
* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 'price' paid for it is lower resolution - but it's still good
> > for those benchmarking TPC-C runs - and /alot/ simpler.
>
> BTW another comment: I was told that at least one of the big databases
> wants ms resolution here. So to make your schem
On Thursday 01 February 2007 12:46, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Inter-CPU monotonicity can not, however, be guaranteed in a vsyscall,
> > so vsyscall is not used by default. [...]
>
> note that this is not actually the case. My patch below, ontop
3 matches
Mail list logo
