On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:54:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:06:18 +
> Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:00:49 -0800
> > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECT
Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, but you're using -mm, yes? And -mm has (the rather irritating)
> convert-i386-pda-code-to-use-%fs.patch in it.
>
> So perhaps your fix is a -mm-only thing?
>
Yes, I think that's true.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:22:05AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
>>
>>> Following the i386 pda patches, it's not possible to set gs or fs value
>>> from gdb anymore. The following patch restores the old behaviour of
>>> getting an
Andrew Morton wrote:
> The below is what I have queued for urgent mainlining to address these
> problems.
>
> Is it sufficient?
>
It is sufficient to fix the serious eflags-clobbering bug, but it
doesn't fix the read-and-modify correctness problem Frederik found.
J
-
To unsubscribe from th
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:00:49 -0800
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > > This is a -mm1 kernel + your efl_offset fix + the attached patch.
> > > So the problem came from putreg still sa
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> This is a -mm1 kernel + your efl_offset fix + the attached patch.
> So the problem came from putreg still saving %gs to the stack where
> there's no slot for it, whereas getreg got things right.
>
That patch looks good, but I think it is already effectively in Andrew'
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:22:05AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > Following the i386 pda patches, it's not possible to set gs or fs value
> > from gdb anymore. The following patch restores the old behaviour of
> > getting and setting thread.gs of thread.fs respecti
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:22:05AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > Following the i386 pda patches, it's not possible to set gs or fs value
> > from gdb anymore. The following patch restores the old behaviour of
> > getting and setting thread.gs of thread.fs respecti
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> Following the i386 pda patches, it's not possible to set gs or fs value
> from gdb anymore. The following patch restores the old behaviour of
> getting and setting thread.gs of thread.fs respectively.
> Here's a gdb session *before* the patch:
> (gdb) info reg
> [...]
> f
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:59:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/
>
Hi all,
Following the i386 pda patches, it's not possible to set gs or fs value
from gdb anymore. The following patch restores the old behaviour of
getting and setting thread.g
10 matches
Mail list logo
