Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

[Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > I have no idea why I invoked ver_linux using "." : I must have seen > it somewhere and just followed it somehow. Who knows. Anyway, the following works in 'bash' at least -- don't know about other shells -- but it's quite a hack Peter --- scripts/ver_linux~

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Ishikawa] > > I just noticed that running > > > > . /usr/src/linux/script/ver_linux > > > > prints out strange libc version > [...] > > I found that if the command "ls" is aliased to "ls -aF" > > So ... don't use '.' to execute scripts. If there is some > docum

Re: /usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

[Ishikawa] > I just noticed that running > > . /usr/src/linux/script/ver_linux > > prints out strange libc version [...] > I found that if the command "ls" is aliased to "ls -aF" So ... don't use '.' to execute scripts. If there is some documentation somewhere that told you to do th

/usr/src/linux/scripts/ver_linux prints out incorrect info when "ls" is aliased.

I just noticed that running . /usr/src/linux/script/ver_linux prints out strange libc version when I run it as a normal user. It prints out expected output if I run it as superuser. Output Example: Incorrect and correct examples. Binutils 2.10.0.26 ! Linux C Library