On 03/05/2013 06:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >
>> > Am I doing something really stupid here?
>> >
>> > This is using a 32-bit i386 kernel.
>> >
>>From reading the patch I thought you had to pass the address via
> reference. Otherwise you get the warning like you mention here, and then
> probably
On 03/05/13 17:18, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I went to go use the shiny new %pa specifier:
>
> void test_printk_pa(void)
> {
> phys_addr_t p = 0x1234;
> printk("p: %pa\n", p);
> }
>
> but gcc is spewing out warnings at me:
>
>> arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c: In function ‘test_printk_pa’:
>> arc
I went to go use the shiny new %pa specifier:
void test_printk_pa(void)
{
phys_addr_t p = 0x1234;
printk("p: %pa\n", p);
}
but gcc is spewing out warnings at me:
> arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c: In function ‘test_printk_pa’:
> arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:95:2: warning: format ‘%p’ expects ar
3 matches
Mail list logo
