From: John Zhao
When no file /path was found, the error code of -ENOENT
enumerated in errno-base.h, is returned. Stating clearly that
the file was not found is much more useful for debugging, So
let's be explicit about that.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 8
On 2019-02-05 07:30 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 05:58:30PM +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
Hi,
Refined at below.
From bbd0d9c8f28eb78ca34353347c3d4092e88f000c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
This is all garbled, not sure why your patch looks all messed up.
Are you
Hi,
Refined at below.
From bbd0d9c8f28eb78ca34353347c3d4092e88f000c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
When the return code of "-ENOENT" was printed inside
of the debug message, which could be hardcoded meaningfully.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 8
1
From d6892f54a81bf85ad011bfb8822567690713d575 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
When the return code of "-ENOENT" was printed inside
of the debug message, which could be hardcoded simply.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 d
On 2018-12-07 04:38 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 06/12/2018 15:22:51+0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi,
Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending
Hi,
Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
alrm_time : 00:00:00
alrm_date : 1970-01-01
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending: no
to:
alarm time : 00:00:00
alarm date : 1970-01-01
alarm IRQ
Hi,
From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b
Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 8
On 2018-04-21 03:24 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 14:44 +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-20 09:47 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
[]
> [ZJ] Further prototyping has been given based on gcc for both of
> x86_64 and armv8-a,
> unsigned int and bool share the
On 2018-04-20 09:47 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-11 07:20 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
++
On 2018-04-11 07:09 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
++
On 2018-04-10 10:49 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Typo...
On 2018-04-10 10:08 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On
On 2018-04-11 07:20 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
++
On 2018-04-11 07:09 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
++
On 2018-04-10 10:49 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Typo...
On 2018-04-10 10:08 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 07:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10
On 2018-04-19 06:42 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-19 02:48 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-19 01:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 06:40 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
On 2018-04-19 02:48 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-19 01:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 06:40 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 17:07 +0800, yuank...@codeau
On 2018-04-19 01:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 06:40 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 17:07 +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > Hi julia,
> > >
> > > On 2018-04-1
Hi julia,
On 2018-04-15 05:19 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 08:22 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 09:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > We already have some 500 bools-in-str
++
On 2018-04-11 07:09 AM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
++
On 2018-04-10 10:49 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Typo...
On 2018-04-10 10:08 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 07:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10
++
On 2018-04-10 10:49 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Typo...
On 2018-04-10 10:08 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 07:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 05:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yu
Typo...
On 2018-04-10 10:08 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 07:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 05:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2018-04-10 04:00 PM, Raf
On 2018-04-10 07:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 05:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2018-04-10 04:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:33 AM, wr
Hi Thomas,
On 2018-04-10 05:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2018-04-10 04:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:33 AM, wrote:
> > From: John Zhao
> >
> > Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
> > ca
Subject and commit message have been updated due for typo.
This patch is based on the tip of linux-pm-cpuild branch.
Thanks
On 2018-04-10 04:51 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can only be true / false values. Since th
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can only be true / false values. Since the return type
of the tick_nohz_tick_stopped is also bool, variable
tick_stopped nice to have data type as 'bool' in place of
the 'unsigned int'.
Moreover, the executed instructions c
On 2018-04-10 04:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:33 AM, wrote:
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can have only true / forse values. Since the return type
of the tick_nohz_tick_stopped is also bool, variable
tick_stopped nice to
On 2018-04-10 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can have only true / forse values. Since the return type
of the tick_nohz_tick_stopped is also bool, variable
tick_stoppe
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can only be true / false values. Since the return type
of the tick_nohz_tick_stopped is also bool, variable
tick_stopped nice to have data type as bool in place of int.
Moreover, the executed instructions cost could be mini
From: John Zhao
Variable tick_stopped returned by tick_nohz_tick_stopped
can have only true / forse values. Since the return type
of the tick_nohz_tick_stopped is also bool, variable
tick_stopped nice to have data type as bool in place of int.
Moreover, the executed instructions cost could be mi
On 2018-03-26 10:12 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, John.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:05:50PM +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
as a bool, __cpuset_node_allowed(...) return should be bool.
So, as a minor cleanup patch, this is fine but can you please soften
the commit title / description a bi
Hi Tejun,
Additionally,
On 2018-03-26 10:37 PM, yuank...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Hi Tejun,
inline.
On 2018-03-26 10:25 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:20:43PM +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
1) return int type variable in bool function:
bool enabled()
{
Hi Tejun,
inline.
On 2018-03-26 10:25 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:20:43PM +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
1) return int type variable in bool function:
bool enabled()
{
int ret = 1;
return ret;
}
...
2)
bool enabled()
{
bool ret =
Hi Tejun,
inline.
On 2018-03-26 10:12 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, John.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:05:50PM +0800, yuank...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
From 304cec1cc42255fbd9e231a810f4eea20ab74b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Zhao
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:01:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH]
From 304cec1cc42255fbd9e231a810f4eea20ab74b90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Zhao
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:01:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: __cpuset_node_allowed return bool
as a bool, __cpuset_node_allowed(...) return should be bool.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuse
as a bool, __cpuset_node_allowed(...) return should be bool.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao
--- kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c.orig 2018-03-24 12:39:27.854178608 +0800
+++ kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c 2018-03-24 12:40:51.020708670 +0800
@@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_a
bool __cp
31 matches
Mail list logo
