We appreciate your comments.
We refine source code according to your comments.
>> This is an interesting idea, and an evolution since the initial
>> approach which was submitted based upon xattr attributes. I still
>> find the idea of using attributes simpler to manage though, since
>> they're ea
Steve Kemp wrote:
> This is an interesting idea, and an evolution since the initial
> approach which was submitted based upon xattr attributes. I still
> find the idea of using attributes simpler to manage though, since
> they're easy to add, and audit for.
>
> I suspect the biggest objection
> Do you have a target date for posting that?
Yes, we have the target date. We will submit WhiteEgret v4 by September.
> So you have a design for being able to differentiate the interpreters
> reading versus reading with the intent to execute?
> With or without their help?
We will provide WEUA sa
I am one of developers of WhiteEgret.
> regardling the last one, do you have a plan for handling it?
Yes, we have a plan to release WhiteEgret v4 patch with a WEUA sample of access
control for script programs.
The latest WhiteEgret cannot control script programs since script files read by
an in
4 matches
Mail list logo
