Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread rgheck
Mark Lord wrote: rgheck wrote: Alan Cox wrote: not one problem but lots---is sufficiently widespread that a Mini HOWTO, say, would be really welcome and, I'm guessing, widely used. We don't see very many libata problems at the distro level and they for the most part bo

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread rgheck
Alan Cox wrote: not one problem but lots---is sufficiently widespread that a Mini HOWTO, say, would be really welcome and, I'm guessing, widely used. We don't see very many libata problems at the distro level and they for the most part boil down to - sata_nv with >4GB of RAM, knowing bein

Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24

2008-01-29 Thread rgheck
Mark Lord wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: .. Does anyone know why my dvdwriter isn't being assigned a '/dev/sdx' number when dmesg says its found ok at ata2.00? I've turned on an option that says something about using the bios for device access this build, but I'll be surprised if that's it. :)