Re: [2.6.23] Unable to boot kernel, regression?

On 10/11/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > > > Did something got changes which i forgot to take care of? or am i > > missing something pretty obvious here? > > i have successfully built and booted a config derived from your config, > on similar hardware. The only change is that

[2.6.23] Unable to boot kernel, regression?

Hi All, I pulled the latest 2.6.23 changes to my local git repository and compiled a fresh kernel. The kernel boots fine but seem to be waiting for root filesystem. The system is very much responsive at this stage, capslock, numlock etc keys work. Alt+ctrl+del reboots the system fine. My system i

Re: [Q]Adding src files to 2.6.18 kernel and build failure query

Hi Sam, found the commit in my fresh 2.6 git repo. Thanks a lot for help. Best Regards --pradeep On 9/11/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:17:48AM +0530, pradeep singh rautela wrote: > > On 9/10/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL

Re: [Q]Adding src files to 2.6.18 kernel and build failure query

po and added manually rules to .git/info/exclude instead. This did the trick and git-archiv'ing did not result in a broken bzipped tree. Perhaps i did something silly or may be something to do with git. ?? Thanks for the hint Sam. --pradeep -- pradeep singh rautela "question = ( to ) ? be

[Q]Adding src files to 2.6.18 kernel and build failure query

this thing vanishes away and kernel compiles as usual like it always did earlier? Any pointers? PS:- I am not subscribed to the LKML,please CC me while replying to the list. thanks --pradeep -- pradeep singh rautela "question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;" -- Wm. Shakespeare -

Re: Altering kernel path execution using module

On 5/28/07, pradeep singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to change the normal kernel execution path using a loadable module, without actually patching the kernel? e.g fun1()->fun2()->fun3()->fun4()->fun5()->fun6() Can i change this method invocation