Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?

2001-01-11 Thread mo6
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote: > > Robert Kaiser wrote: > > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on > > > 486 and Pentium Systems. > > > > > > Any ideas/suggestions ? > > > > > > is "Checking if th

Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?

2001-01-10 Thread mo6
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 03:18:41PM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote: > > move up to 2.4.0-testX kernels I just tested 2.4.0-test1, it doesn't boot on the 386 with the same symptoms as 2.4.0. 2.3.99-pre9 same. 2.3.99-pre8 is the last one that boots correctly. There is one weird thing I notice, the vg

Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?

2001-01-10 Thread mo6
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote: > On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote: > > Robert Kaiser wrote: > > > I can't seem to get the new 2.4.0 kernel running on a 386 CPU. > > > The kernel was built for a 386 Processor, Math emulation has been enabled. > > > I tried three differe