RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-26 Thread karl malbrain
Successful resolution!! The red-hat engineers monitoring their bugzilla list posted a fix for tty_io.c Friday that works. Thanks again for your help. karl m > -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:54 PM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PR

RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:54 PM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:17:01PM -0700, karl malbrain wrote:

RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 1:59 PM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:52:15PM -0700, karl malbrain wrote:

RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 1:31 PM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM -0700, karl malbrain wrote:

Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
- Original Message - From: "Russell King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "karl malbrain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org" Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 1:32 PM Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > On Fri, Jul 15,

RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:23 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:00PM -0700, karl malbrain wrot

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Richard B. Johnson > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 8:53 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote: > > > I've a

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:29 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: &

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-15 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 12:29 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: &

RE: 2.6.9 chrdev_open: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
chrdev_open issues a lock_kernel() before calling uart_open. It would appear that servicing the blocking open request uart_open goes to sleep with the kernel locked. Would this shut down subsequent access to opening "/dev/tty"??? karl m - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:57 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:16:23AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: > >

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Russell > King > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:57 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Thu, Jul 14,

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-14 Thread karl malbrain
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 1:27 AM > To: karl malbrain > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kernel. Org > Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:53:19AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: > >

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-13 Thread karl malbrain
t the boot sequence probes for modems on the serial ports. Is it possible that 8250.c is having a problem servicing an interrupt from a character/state-change left over from this initialization? Thanks, karl m -Original Message- From: Richard B. Johnson Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:04 A

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-12 Thread karl malbrain
-Original Message- From: Russell King Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:04 PM To: karl malbrain Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:36:51AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote: > The uart_open code loops waiting for CD to

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-12 Thread karl malbrain
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote: > >>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote: >> >>>> The uart_open code loops waiting for CD to be asserted (whenever CLOCAL >>>> is not set). The bottom of the loop contains the following code: >>

RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-12 Thread karl malbrain
>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote: >> The uart_open code loops waiting for CD to be asserted (whenever CLOCAL >> is not set). The bottom of the loop contains the following code: >> >> up(&state->sem); >> schedule(); >> down(&state->

2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

2005-07-12 Thread karl malbrain
il awakened by an event to replace this looping behaviour? Thanks, karl malbrain, malbrain-at-yahoo-dot-com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom