On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:05:52PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:55 PM k...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > +static enum s3fwrn5_mode s3fwrn82_uart_get_mode(void *phy_id)
> > > +{
> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy = phy_id;
>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM k...@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> > examples:
> > >- |
> > > #include
> > > @@ -
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:56:58PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> Since S3FWRN82 NFC Chip, The UART interface can be used.
> S3FWRN82 uses NCI protocol and supports I2C and UART interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
Please start sending emails properly, e.g. with git send-email, so all
your pat
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> Since S3FWRN82 NFC Chip, The UART interface can be used.
> S3FWRN82 supports I2C and UART interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
> ---
> .../bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml | 28 +--
> 1 file changed, 26
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> max_payload is unused.
Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you
with a tag, so you should include it.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlow
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:17:42AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> stucture should be replaced by structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
I already reviewed it.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:18:50AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
> ---
> drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/s3fwrn5.h | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I already reviewed it.
Reviewed-by: Krzyszt
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:17:55AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> stucture should be replaced by structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
> ---
> drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:19:50AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
> ---
> drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/s3fwrn5.h | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best r
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:12:05AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> max_payload is unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon
Please version your patches (this should be a v2) and describe changes
between versions in changelog, either in cover letter or after ---
separator.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlow
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:57:36AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 10:17 +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:30:44AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 16:59 +0200, K
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 06:30:44AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 16:59 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt
> > flags.
> > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will
> > not
> > hav
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:22:18AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 09:50 +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:45:00AM +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:25:37AM +0200, k...@kern
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:45:00AM +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:25:37AM +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:51:33AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > Hello Krzysztof,
> > >
> > > Just some questions -
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:25:37AM +0200, k...@kernel.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:51:33AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > Hello Krzysztof,
> >
> > Just some questions - please ignore if I misunderstood the impact of
> > the change.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:51:33AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> Just some questions - please ignore if I misunderstood the impact of
> the change.
>
> On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 21:06 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Device tree schema expects regulator names to be lowerc
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:23:36AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 21:06 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The input clock and number of clock provider cells are not required
> > for
> > the PMIC to operate. They are needed only for the optional
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:28PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> The Kontron N6x1x SoMs all use uart4 as a debug serial interface.
> Therefore we set in the 'chosen' node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-commo
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:36PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> Add the compatibles for Kontron i.MX6UL N6311 SoM and boards and
> the compatibles for Kontron i.MX6ULL N6411 SoM and boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bind
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:28PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> The 'N6311 S' and the 'N6411 S' are similar to the Kontron 'N6310 S'
> evaluation kit boards. Instead of the N6310 SoM, they feature a N6311
> or N6411 SoM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf
> ---
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:25PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> The baseboard for the Kontron N6310 SoM is also used for other SoMs
> such as N6311 and N6411. In order to share the code, we move the
> definitions of the baseboard to a separate dtsi file.
>
> Signed
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:21PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> The N6311 and the N6411 SoM are similar to the Kontron N6310 SoM.
> They are pin-compatible, but feature a larger RAM and NAND flash
> (512MiB instead of 256MiB). Further, the N6411 has an i.MX6ULL SoC,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:19PM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf
>
> The Kontron N6311 and N6411 SoMs are very similar to N6310. In
> preparation to add support for them, we move the common nodes to a
> separate file imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-common.dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-
23 matches
Mail list logo
