> > I'm assuming you're running some sort of Fedora/RHEL/
> > derivative; this is what you get when you have a device that starts
> > out named ethX, but which needed to be renamed so that an already
> > configured ethX could be changed to that name.
>
> yes, it's FC6.
>
> > For the new device, eit
On 9/6/07, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > >dear all,
> > >I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
> > >devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
> > >device names to what I want, I go
dear all,
I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
device names to what I want, I got a __tmpX form of device name,
which I think is a half-configured device... but which piece of
software is to bl
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
I'
maybe RTFM...
a module:
- char device driver for..
- a PCI device
any clue as to how to protect from module unloading while there is still
some process opening it??? have I to sleep in the remove_one() pci
driver function till last process closes its file descriptor???
static void __devexit aped
I'm authoring a (GPL) driver for a custom 3D network card.
on calling some polling functions from within a workqueue, I'm getting
lockups... sysrq-p got it clear I have a workqueue thread down into
schedule_timeout().
is considered polite to call schedule ? is in_softirq() capable to diff
work
6 matches
Mail list logo
