El Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST),
"Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as
> you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the
> community.
Who cares, really?
1) Linux was never supposed to have a
El Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:57:55 -0500 (EST),
"Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Even today, some top developers do not use BK and manage to get along
Do like them, ignore BK and continue using patch & diff. BK is just a option,
It
doesn't stops you from developing in the linux kernel, I can't
El Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:45:27 +0900,
Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> than mature VCS. Apache group is switching to it, gcc people are
> strongly thinking about it, and those two are _huge_ projects with tons
> of developers, patches, trunks, etc.
and all of them work today
El Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:22:39 +0100 (CET),
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> To remind you the main problem was and is still, that the kernel history
> is locked into bk. At this point I'm not really sure, whether all bk user
> realize this, as you constantly try to distract them with
El 09 Feb 2005 05:06:02 -0200,
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> So you've somehow managed to trick most kernel developers into
> granting you power over not only the BK history, in such a way that
> anyone willing to extract all the information available from the BK
> repository and
5 matches
Mail list logo
