Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Adrian Bunk wrote: [...] Your reasoning makes sense. But it may be not adapted for applications like apache. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-

Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Chris Snook wrote: Why are you asking the developers? We do this for the sake of the users. The kernel is the software of the developers. It's important to know how they want it to be distributed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a mes

Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Rik van Riel wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:56:57 +0100 ciol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Wouldn't you prefer they ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&q

[poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions: * Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel? * Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who want or just have a new hardware? * Do you think