ICMP spoofing protection: Is this code sane?

the boxes of the users that will load the module, I want to learn if it's ok. Thanks in advance for your support. p.s. obviously comments about the protection design used will help as weel. -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://

Re: * 4 converted to << 2 for networking code

lecting the better form. -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez | PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: * 4 converted to << 2 for networking code

7;s better to use just a format, and it seems more appropriate to write << 2, just to reflect what we want. Also some piece of kernel code may be used with compilers that does not optimize power of two. antirez (CC me) -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL P

* 4 converted to << 2 for networking code

e to apply the patch. The patch is for linux-2.4. Please, CC: me for replies since I'm not subscribed to the list. regards, antirez -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez | PGP: finger [EMAIL PRO

Re: USB broken in 2.4.0

www.kyuzz.org/antirez/s10sh.html antirez -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez | PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: USB broken in 2.4.0

implement the USB drivers in kernel space a full-featured USB user space access should be allowed. antirez (please cc me) -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez | PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe

Re: USB broken in 2.4.0

On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:39:36AM +0100, antirez wrote: > s10sh reads 0x1400 bytes at once downloading jpges from the > digicam, but the ioctl() that performs the bulk read fails with 2.4 > using this size. If I resize it (for example to 0x300) it works without > problems (with hig

Re: USB broken in 2.4.0

On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:04:29AM +0100, antirez wrote: > I'll do some test with the new 2.4 kernel to find if there is a problem > in s10sh itself. A good test can be to try if the equivalent driver > of gphoto works without problems using the 2.4 kernel (however it also > uses

Re: USB broken in 2.4.0

e s10sh bug may be not necessarly related to the USB subsystem. regards, antirez -- Salvatore Sanfilippo | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez | PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri