Re: [PATCH v18 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()

_args we pass that into the > shadow stack code rather than individual fields. > > Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe. > > Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Tested on a fast model with a WIP Glibc patch that uses extende

Re: [PATCH RFT v17 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()

now > using more fields from the kernel_clone_args we pass that into the > shadow stack code rather than individual fields. > > Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe. > > Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev LGTM. I've tested this change on the FVP model

Re: [PATCH RFT v12 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()

> using more fields from the kernel_clone_args we pass that into the > shadow stack code rather than individual fields. > > Portions of the x86 architecture code were written by Rick Edgecombe. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev > @@

Re: [PATCH RFT v12 2/8] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation

by: Mark Brown > --- > Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst| 1 + > Documentation/userspace-api/shadow_stack.rst | 42 > ++++ > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+) Acked-by: Yury Khrustalev

Re: [PATCH RFT v11 0/8] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3()

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 02:08:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > The kernel has recently added support for shadow stacks, currently > > x86 only using their CET feature but both arm64 and RISC-V have > > equivalent features (GCS and Zicfi

Re: [PATCH RFT v9 4/8] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()

On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Thanks for the info! > > > > > > > > My preference is to keep the api consistent and require a stack_size for > > > shadow stacks as well. > > > > Did you catch that a token can be at a different offsets location on the > >