sysctl table, s390 and xfs

2008-01-24 Thread Yum Rayan
With reference to 2.6.24-rc5, I see in 3 #include "../arch/s390/appldata/appldata.h" 4 #include "../fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sysctl.h" Can this be done any better? Should we move these headers to the standard folder? Protect them with "#ifdef CONFIG_" ? I have a x86 configuration and

[PATCH linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3] serial_cs: Reduce stack usage in serial_event()

2005-04-21 Thread Yum Rayan
to test it. Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> serial_cs.c | 170 ++-- 1 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) diff -Nupr -X dontdiff linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3.a/dr

[PATCH linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3] smc91c92_cs: Reduce stack usage in smc91c92_event()

2005-04-21 Thread Yum Rayan
would be nice to get feedback if someone that owns the hardware can actually test this patch. Acked-by: Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sm

[PATCH] Cleanup locking in sys_reboot() (was Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in sys.c)

2005-04-01 Thread Yum Rayan
all like sys_reboot() is no big deal, but feedback will always help going forward. I dropped the pick at the stack usage, just the patch to move the locks around... (cleanup?) Thanks, Rayan Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm4.a/kernel/sys.c 2005

[PATCH] Reduce stack usage in time.c

2005-03-31 Thread Yum Rayan
Attempt to reduce stack usage in time.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). Stack usage was noted using checkstack.pl. Specifically: Before patch sys_adjtimex - 128 After patch --- sys_adjtimex - none (register usage only) Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/

[PATCH] Reduce stack usage in sys.c

2005-03-30 Thread Yum Rayan
. Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/kernel/sys.c 2005-03-25 22:11:06.0 -0800 +++ b/kernel/sys.c 2005-03-30 22:34:03.0 -0800 @@ -369,9 +369,9 @@ * * reboot doesn't sync: do that yourself before calling this. */ -asmlinkage long sys_reboot

[PATCH] Reduce stack usage in itimer.c

2005-03-30 Thread Yum Rayan
stack user do_setitimer(...) was broken down into 3 separate functions. Stack usage will now be lower depending on the path taken. Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/kernel/itimer.c 2005-03-25 22:10:33.0 -0800 +++ b/kernel/itimer.c 2005-03-30 15:59:11.0

[PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c

2005-03-30 Thread Yum Rayan
Attempt to reduce stack usage in acct.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). Stack usage was noted using checkstack.pl. Specifically: Before patch check_free_space - 128 do_acct_process - 105 After patch --- check_free_space - 36 do_acct_process - 44 Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EM

Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c

2005-03-29 Thread Yum Rayan
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:43:12 -0800, Randy.Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yum Rayan wrote: > > Attempt to reduce stack usage in module.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3). > > Specifically from checkstack.pl > > > > Before patch > > -- > >

[PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c

2005-03-28 Thread Yum Rayan
(...) - use only as much memory is needed - do not write past array index for the boundary case Patch is against linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3 Thanks, Rayan Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- kernel/module.c.orig2005-03-28 22:32:35.0 -0800 +++ kernel/module.c 2005

[PATCH] Error in ERR_PTR usage

2005-03-19 Thread Yum Rayan
be, I can chop it up for the individual maintainers, but it would be nice if someone can comment first. Thanks, Rayan Signed-off-by: Yum Rayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nur linux-2.6.11.5.orig/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c linux-2.6.11.5/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c --- linux-2