Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

A /proc/credits maybe? Vipin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > > > The later line is not something of interest to most people, and if it > > happens to be they can research it rather than being force-fe

Re: Missing cache flush.

Bjorn Wesen wrote: > > I'd agree that to be really certain, a "flush_dcache()" function > should be implemented and used when an erase finishes. Like David Miller > wrote somewhere in the thread, one way is to use your knowledge of the > arch's cache and do suitable dummy accesses to flush it, if