Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-05 Thread Victor Julien
On 04-06-2020 15:48, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:47 AM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-04 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 22:18, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 PM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 21:38, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:22 PM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote:

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 21:29, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:22:11 +0200 Victor Julien wrote: >> - receiver uses nfp (netronome) driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID set for >> every packet, including the bad TCP ones >> - receiver uses ixgbe driver: TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALI

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 21:03, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:31 PM Victor Julien wrote: >> On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn w

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
Hi Willem, On 02-06-2020 19:37, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote: >>>> >>>> Introduce a n

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
On 02-06-2020 16:29, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Victor Julien wrote: >> >> Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate >> that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the packet. >> >> The TP_STATUS_C

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
2-06-2020 10:05, Victor Julien wrote: > Introduce a new flag (TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY) to indicate > that the driver has completely validated the checksums in the packet. > > The TP_STATUS_CSUM_UNNECESSARY flag differs from TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID > in that the new flag will only be s

[PATCH net-next v2] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-02 Thread Victor Julien
for many of the packets. This patch has been tested with Suricata with the virtio driver, where it reduced the ammount of time spent in the Suricata TCP checksum validation to about half. Signed-off-by: Victor Julien --- Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.rst | 80 +--- incl

Re: [PATCH net-next] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-01 Thread Victor Julien
On 01-06-2020 23:45, David Miller wrote: > From: Victor Julien > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 22:49:37 +0200 > >> @@ -472,6 +472,12 @@ TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALIDThis flag indicates that at >> least the transport >> validated on the kernel s

[PATCH net-next] af-packet: new flag to indicate all csums are good

2020-06-01 Thread Victor Julien
ata TCP checksum validation to about half. Signed-off-by: Victor Julien --- Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.rst | 6 ++ include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h | 1 + net/packet/af_packet.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/network

Re: [OT] Suitable Athlon Motherboard for Linux

2001-07-05 Thread Victor Julien
I run linux on a MSI K7T-turbo-RAID (via kt133a) with a Duron 600@866 (6,5*133) and its is ROCKSTABLE!! Pretty impressive. For stability I can really recommend this board! Victor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion

2001-04-22 Thread Victor Julien
Wow! Now it not only boots right, the sound distortion problem also seems to be fixed!!! Great work! However another problem is still here, i see only one of the two ide-channels of the PDC20265. > > On 2001.04.22 10:47 Victor Julien wrote: > > > 2.4.4-pre6 did only compile wh

Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion

2001-04-22 Thread Victor Julien
only compile when I aplied the '__builtin_expect'-patch. It crashed at boot however, when initializing my onboard raidcontroller (PDC20265 on a MSI K7T Turbo-R). It seems to be the same problem as reported by Manuel A. McLure. So no word yet about the sound distortion-problem being fixed. V

Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion

2001-04-21 Thread Victor Julien
noise. Could it be a problem only triggerd by seti? Is there something special about seti? Victor Julien Please enter my email-adress in the CC. > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:40:30PM +0200, Victor Julien wrote: > > That did not help. The distortion is no stuttering, but noise in

Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion

2001-04-21 Thread Victor Julien
about the sort of noise. The changelog of 2.4.3 said that there were via-chipset-fixes undone, could this be a problem of my chipset? Victor Julien Please enter my email-adress in the CC. On Saturday 21 April 2001 21:05, you wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Victor Julien wrote: > > I

2.4.3+ sound distortion

2001-04-21 Thread Victor Julien
know. If you respond please put my emailadres in the CC, i am not a member of this mailing-list. Victor Julien - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majo