On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 22:55 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> > > I additionally built my 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 kernel without High Resolution
> > > Timer, but the high ping problem is still there.
> >
> > Hmm, that's mysterious. Wild guess is that highres exposes the hidden
> > "feature" in a differe
On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Can you also test the following patch?
> I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard
> shared IRQs, so it might possibly generate a NAPI storm, dunno.
> Worth a try.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/drivers/net/b44.c
>
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 23:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 23:32 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:49 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 21:39:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
> > > Uwe, please try the following patch:
> > >
> > > Index: b
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:57 schrieben Sie:
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > OK, applied this one against 2.6.22-rc3, assuming a typo error by you,
> > Andrew.
> >
> > Result is: No change: non functionable b44 device!
>
> Could you please send the following:
>
&
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 21:19 schrieben Sie:
> Uwe, please try the following patch:
>
> Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/net/b44.c
> ===
> --- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/net/b44.c2007-05-18
> 18:09:50.0 +0200 +
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:19 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that:
> >
> > git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git
> >
> > It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works f
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 20:41 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/26/07, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > > clear enough in the sense
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and
> > comprehensive.
>
>
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:40 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:26:06 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > I think we don't have IRQ assignment problems. Uwe simply disabled
> > > b44-PCI support in his first bugreport (I guess).
> >
> > Yes!
> >
>
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 18:13:09 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
> > > for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
> >
> > err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 18:13 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> > to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> > Well, I'm not the first person in the
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:50 schrieben Sie:
> Andrew,
>
> I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
> him to the killfile, ... .
> I ask to try wireless-dev, as the d
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 17:36 schrieben Sie:
> On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work
> > with aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e.
> > my router) is called Jer
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 07:00 schrieben Sie:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 21:40, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> > > On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 20:48 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:59:29 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Perhaps someone reading this could try to reproduce that problem on his
> > machine.
> > Now who of the readers owes a Broadcom 4401 NIC and can please try to
> >
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 18:56 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 16:52:19 +0200 Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I bet your bug is _not_ caused by ssb, but by some other breakage
> > in another subsystem. Maybe ACPI or APIC is broken? Try to boot
> > the machine without ACPI and/or
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 19:28 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:01:34 +0200 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At Thu, 24 May 2007 13:09:21 -0700,
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
> > >
> >
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 16:52 schrieben Sie:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 15:59:49 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Well if you're so clever in software development then please provide an
> > exception handling for the ssb module which is specifically NOT needed by
> > my onboard contro
Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2007 15:12 schrieben Sie:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 22:06:59 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
> >
> > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> >
> > (added linux-wirele
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:06 schrieben Sie:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:56:16 +0200
>
> "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
>
> (added linux-wireless, others)
>
> > The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two cons
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 22:09 schrieben Sie:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:00:52 +0200
>
> "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0
> > module, BUT:
>
Hi everybody,
with 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 I do get sound out of my machine using snd-intel8x0 module,
BUT:
At least parts of that Alsa sound architecture do seem to be broken:
dmesg looks like this:
31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: APIC 1FFEC058, 005A (r1 ASUS P4PE 42302E31 MSFT 31313031)
ACPI: PM-Timer
Hi everybody,
The patch against b44.c contained in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 has two consequences:
1. a tight binding to module ssb whose function or necessity I neither see
through nor do comprehend
2. a breakdown (disfunctionality) of my onboard NIC.
lspci -v looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Inte
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 22:18 schrieben Sie:
> On May 20 2007 07:28, Al Viro wrote:
> >On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> >> feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> >> issue
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 13:18 schrieben Sie:
> Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 00:54 schrieben Sie:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:28:57 +0200
> >
> > "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE
Hello everybody,
kernel 2.6.21.1 makes my machine Oops about 20 seconds after KDE 3,5 is brought
up showing its graphical login (kdm):
lspci -v, based on a "sane" kernel 2.6.22-rc2 or 2.6.20.11 (with both of them
the Oops does not happen at all) looks like this:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon In
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 22:48 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device
> > up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the "fancy
> > on-demand device instantiation feature".
> >
> > So
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when
> > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with
> > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop". However, th
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 08:40 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/20/07, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/19/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yeah, that's the only one left. I was hoping it wasn't that one, as it
> > > claimed to have been tested extensively. Guess it wasn't tested with
>
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 18:16 schrieben Sie:
> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 09:10 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > On 5/20/07, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5/20/07, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 5/19/07, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:1
Am Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007 08:58 schrieben Sie:
> On Sunday 20 May 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:16:59PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > Ken? Ball's in your court. As the patch isn't providing a killer
> > > feature for 2.6.22, I'd suggest just reverting it for now until the
> > > i
Hi,
I am running Debian Etch 4.0 stable in connection with udev.
In kernel 2.6.22-rc2 the number of available loop mounts is reduced from 8
(conventional standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
Symptom: If you try to mount more than one single iso-image with
the loop parameter you are receivin
Hi,
The patch against loop.c is neither a fix, nor does it create
loop devices on demand:
Facts are instead, at least on my machine:
The number of available loop devices is reduced from 8 (conventional
standard of preceding 2.6 kernels) to 1.
The consequence is: If you have to mount more than o
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
point
t; Original Message
> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
> pseudo-authorities
> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400
> From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTEC
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:59:18 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.o
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:48:50 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:15:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module custo
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:30:32 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list
, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:35:44 +0100
Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:38 +0100
Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:20:01 +0200
Von: e9hack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 18:40:54 +0200
Von: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betre
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Betreff: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module cust
no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB
> > card but you're only encouraging Uwe to be abusive since it seems to
> > help get him what he wants:
> >
> > On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Piepho, you are a devil, and your links
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 04:19:41 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 02:58:49 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Michael Krufky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linus Torvalds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list ,
Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROT
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing list , Michael Krufky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-d
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:14:14 -0700
Von: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:30:34 -0400
Von: Michael Krufky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTEC
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:04:43 +0200
Von: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:06:11 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:48:34 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "hermann pitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[E
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0200
Von: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
>
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:58:33 +0200
Von: hermann pitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
B
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Cri
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Cri
Hi,
I swear I tested all seven release candidates of 2.6.21.
All were fine, and at least I haven't found any regressions.
But, what causes me some headache:
It seems to me that at every transition from the last release candidate
to the full kernel version stuff is being pushed in that should neve
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:57:34 -0800 (PST)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: bugs in kernel 2.6.21 (both two release candidates) and ke
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:30:13 -0800 (PST)
Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: bugs in kernel 2.6.21 (both two release candidates) and ke
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:25:29 +0100
Von: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betref
Hi folks,
the floppy mount error I mentioned is gone now in 2.6.21-rc2, and my kernel is
smaller. Good decision to rip out Stephane's stuff, Linus!
As I did not get a reply from Andrew I hope that the buggy stuff residing in
2.6.20-mm1 ( freezing my apache services
- I already mentioned the probl
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:31:25 +0100
Von: Marcel Siegert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
CC: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Slaby <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.k
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:14:52 -0800
Von: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-dvb@linuxtv.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi folks,
trying to compile kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git2 is impossible. The broken module where
the compiler gives up is /arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.
Regards
Uwe
P. S.: Wouldn't it be a good idea to test at least error-free compilation
before stuff like this is being published?
--
"Feel free" - 10
far please?
Signed-off-by: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
} else {
/* loop is done by the caller */
+
he bt8xx documentation fix
(i. e. patch 1 / 3).
Written, tested with a Pinnacle PCTV Sat without CI extension and:
Signed-off-by: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/Makefile
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-obj-$(CONFIG_DVB_BT8XX) += bt878.o dvb
Hi,
one problem in this mail is already being discussed - excellent!
The rest is cced now to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org just to take care for that
it is not forgotten and to help to avoid that rubbish is not being pushed into
mainline vanilla:
In the current 2.6.20 kernels I found three bugs:
Hi everybody,
"The bug was introduced somewhere at the transition of 2.6.20 towards
2.6.20-git14."
I fortunately had some git9 patch at home and found out that it is sane.
In so far the floppy mount bug was introduced somewhen between 2.6.20-git10 and
2.6.20-git14.
"I'm afraid that the most proac
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:07:29 -0800
Von: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: bug in kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git1: con
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:07:29 -0800
Von: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: bug in kernel 2.6.21-rc1-git1: con
Hi folks,
Second attempt now:
I already reported to Linus Torvalds and Andrew Morton that it is impossible to
mount a conventional floppy drive without hanging up the whole system.
Andrew's reaction was quite ambiguous: "We did not break it"
Once again and for the last time: I do not state that f
27;m considering you in any other way possibly
> involved with one or more of these issues.
>
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
>
>
> Subject: problems with CD burning
> References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg06545.html
83 matches
Mail list logo
