Right, I've now disabled every grsecurity kernel config option, apart
from the overarching "Getrewted Kernel Security" one - indicating the
problem is in one of the non #ifdef parts of the patch. Could this be a
problem:
diff -ruN linux/fs/namei.c linux/fs/namei.c
--- linux/fs/namei.cSat May
I use debugfs to remove the flag before fsck'ing:
Start debugfs.
Type
open -f -w /dev/
features -FEATURE_C5
-tony
On 26 Jun 2001 00:25:32 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 21:51, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Daniel writes:
> > > Sure, if your root partition is expendable,
After some testing, removing the grsecurity patch seems to have solved
the disappearing-free-space problem. Now just need to find out why.
On 20 Jun 2001 18:58:43 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2001 16:59, Tony Gale wrote:
> > The main problem I have with thi
The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
it rather difficult to use, especially for your root fs.
And, since I used it, and have since stopped using it, I have a problem
in what all my disk free s
ling overheads. Has anyone seen
> something like
> this before with pthread applications running on SMP platforms? Any
> suggestions or pointers on this subject?
>
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
When you jump for joy, beware that no-one moves the ground from beneath
y
I see no reason to expect that
> there's only
> one such bug causing X to fall over :)
It's a good premise :-)
-tony
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I base my fashion taste on what doesn't itch.
-- Gilda Radner
The views expressed above are en
I'm not. Since I
> can't get
> XFree 4 stable on 2.2 I dont have a useful setup to study this.
>
I've had a report that 2.4.2pre3 has sorted out the problem, so am
trying that. Grabs straw: maybe the VM accounting changes have helped?
-tony
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMA
mptoms are
random segfaults in perfectly fine XFree86 code.
-
Anyone looking into this?
-tony
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free,
... it expects what never was and never will be.
-- Thomas Jefferson
The v
differentiates between SYN+frag and noSYN+frag.
>
> All very nasty, but unfortunately there is no alternative.
>
Nasty but necessary. Such is life.
-tony
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Isn't it nice that people who prefer Los Angeles to San Francisco live ther
On 17-Jan-2001 Jussi Hamalainen wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Tony Gale wrote:
>
>> It looks like this is due to the odd way in which ipchains handles
>> fragments. Try:
>>
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag
>
> Thanks, this seems to do the t
t; -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Never trust anybody whose arm is bigger than your le
;t exactly flag you as
the maintainer.
--- ip_fw.c.origThu Jul 13 12:44:42 2000
+++ ip_fw.c Mon Sep 18 08:59:37 2000
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
* John McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Thomas Lopatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* 21-Oct-1999: Applied count fix by
029: R
> 3147707184:3147707184(0) win 0
>
>
> Why is it sending a reset? Because the FIN was ACK'ed twice? Is
> this correct
> behavior? I've tried 2.2.14 and 2.2.17, with the same result.
>
---
E-Mail: Tony Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Disclose classified in
13 matches
Mail list logo
