On 06/07/2013 07:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:55:59AM +0200, Tobias Winter wrote:
>> On 06/07/2013 08:00 AM, Tobias Winter wrote:
>>> CC drivers/usb/serial/console.o
>>> drivers/usb/serial/console.c: In function ‘usb_console_setup’:
>>&
On 06/07/2013 08:00 AM, Tobias Winter wrote:
> CC drivers/usb/serial/console.o
> drivers/usb/serial/console.c: In function ‘usb_console_setup’:
> drivers/usb/serial/console.c:111:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘usb_serial_get_by_index’ [-Werror=implicit-function
Hey Greg,
I patched it two times to be safe, but I can't seem to get it to compile.
CC drivers/usb/serial/console.o
drivers/usb/serial/console.c: In function ‘usb_console_setup’:
drivers/usb/serial/console.c:111:2: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘usb_serial_get_by_index’ [-Werror=
On 06.06.2013 17:21, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:01:12AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:54:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> > These patches make the USB to serial core have the ability to support up
>> > to 3000 devices at once now.
>>
>> I'm curious how thi
Hi Greg,
On 06/05/2013 07:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> Here are 3 patches that I've tested out on my system with only a small
> number of devices, but it seems to work, so why not let others try it
> out...
It compiles and runs without any errors. My current setup has 272 ftdi
devices connected:
resc
On 04.06.2013 04:49, Greg KH wrote:
> Tobias, can you test this patch out? Note, I only compiled it, did not
> get the chance to actually run it, so it might not work at all.
Sure, I'll gladly give it a try. Seeing the comments on the code, I'm
just wondering if there might be a more recent versi
Raise the maximum number of usb-serial devices to 256, which is the
actual limit supported by the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Jakob-Tobias Winter
Tested-by: Jakob-Tobias Winter
---
include/linux/usb/serial.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/usb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:07:48PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Sounds like bad memory. Run memtest for at least 24hrs.
>
Did so. After quite some time memtest found errors. Switching the
module in question resolved th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>> I upgraded my system to fairly new hardware and find myself unable to
>> compile any kernel source and the system panics under high load e.g.
>> resyncing a RAID or building
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi folks, I'm sending the bug report here, since i have no idea where
else to send it. I hope it is helping.
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
The kernel panics under high CPU/IO load, compilers segfault, mdadm
used to do so, too.
[2.] Full de
10 matches
Mail list logo
