On 7/8/05, Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Timothy R. Chavez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > @@ -69,6 +70,8 @@ int inode_setattr(struct inode * inode,
> > unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid;
> > int error = 0;
> >
> >
On Friday 08 July 2005 12:46, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:49:15PM -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> >
> > Even if access control prohibits us from actually seeing the content of
> > /etc/shadow, if we're auditing /etc/shadow, attempts should be logged
On Thursday 07 July 2005 16:31, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > Tim's code lets you say I want change notification to this file only. The
> > notification follows the audit format with all relavant pieces of
> > information
> > gathered at t
On Thursday 07 July 2005 13:10, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:26:51AM -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 July 2005 18:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:23:10PM -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > > > This is simila
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 18:50, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:23:10PM -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > This is similar to Inotify in that the audit subsystem watches for file
> > system activity and collects information about inodes its interested
> > in,
/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; witho
inserted into the file system by the administrator,
the audit subsystem takes over its maintenance until its removal.
We've submitted for inclusion to the -mm tree.
Thank you.
-tim
Signed-off-by: Timothy R. Chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/attr.c |3
f
ailored specifically for inotify (and accommodates
dnotify out of obligation) and openly implements the "generic" hooks
it requires.
Regardless, if this is the way it's going to be done. We'll expand
fs_notify.h to meet our needs as well.
Also, FYI:
I just purchased th
urpose OR there any
> other (better) methods of communication??
Perhaps netlink? Here's an introduction: http://qos.ittc.ku.edu/netlink/html/
>
> Regards,
> Ravindra N.
--
- Timothy R. Chavez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&qu
9 matches
Mail list logo