Re: [PATCH] x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some processors

CONFIG_X86_32) += intel.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)+= intel.o This config option should probably depend on X86_32. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling

On 1/18/08, Michael Opdenacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you mean "almost nothing"? It still allocates and adds a platform > device, and the corresponding function always gets called at boot time. Nothing significant then. I don't see any added functionality

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling

I can tell, it does *nothing*. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

tty->name conversion?

useful to consider if we ever intend to create real unnumbered character/block devices. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (This message is digitally signed. Please encrypt mail if possible.) "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it."

tty kill character handling problems

gt;read_lock, flags); tty->read_cnt -= ((tty->read_head - tty->canon_head) & (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - 1)); -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail. "Any technology, no matter how primitive