On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:04 PM Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 22:25 +0530, Subhashini Rao Beerisetty wrote:
> > I have an application which finds the data rate over the PCIe
> > interface. I’m getting the lesser data rate in one of my Linux X86
> >
[ Please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed to the list]
Hi all,
I have an application which finds the data rate over the PCIe
interface. I’m getting the lesser data rate in one of my Linux X86
systems.
When I change the scaling_governor from "powersave" to "performance"
mode for each CPU, then
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:16 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:16 AM Subhashini Rao Beerisetty
> wrote:
> > Yes, those are out-of-tree modules. Basically, my question is, in
> > general what is the difference between 'general protection fault' a
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:29 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 5/16/20 6:53 AM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 May 2020 18:05:07 +0530, Subhashini Rao Beerisetty said:
> >
> >> In the first attempt when I run that test case I landed into “general
> >
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 7:23 PM Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 May 2020 18:05:07 +0530, Subhashini Rao Beerisetty said:
>
> > In the first attempt when I run that test case I landed into “general
> > protection fault: [#1] SMP" .. Next I rebooted and ran t
Hi all,
In my Linux box, I see that kernel crashes for a known test case.
In the first attempt when I run that test case I landed into “general
protection fault: [#1] SMP" .. Next I rebooted and ran the same
test , but now it resulted the “Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP".
In both cases the call trace l
6 matches
Mail list logo
