Hi Coly,
is this the deadlock I reported some weeks ago?
Greets,
Stefan
Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone.
Am 27.09.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Eddie Chapman mailto:ed...@ehuk.net>>:
> On 27/09/18 16:23, Coly Li wrote:
>> On 9/27/18 9:45 PM, guoju wrote:
>>> After write SSD completed, bcache
Am 10.09.2018 um 22:08 schrieb David Rientjes:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>> From: Michal Hocko
>>
>> Andrea has noticed [1] that a THP allocation might be really disruptive
>> when allocated on NUMA system with the local node full or hard to
>> reclaim. Stefan has posted an allo
MA placement.
>
> Be careful when the vma has an explicit numa binding though, because
> __GFP_THISNODE is not playing well with it. We want to follow the
> explicit numa policy rather than enforce a node which happens to be
> local to the cpu we are running on.
>
> [1] http://
Am 08.09.2016 um 19:33 schrieb Shaohua Li:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:16:59AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 09/08/2016 02:23 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while trying Kernel 4.8-rc5 my raid5 breaks every few minutes.
>&
Hi,
while trying Kernel 4.8-rc5 my raid5 breaks every few minutes.
Trace:
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at block/blk-core.c:2032!
invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: netconsole ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_multiport
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables 8021q garp bondi
Am 31.05.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:11:42AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>> I'm half tempted at this point to mostly ignore this mm/ behavour
>>> because we are moving down the path of removing buffer heads from
>&g
Am 31.05.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:11:42AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>> I'm half tempted at this point to mostly ignore this mm/ behavour
>>> because we are moving down the path of removing buffer heads from
>&g
Hi Dave,
Am 31.05.2016 um 08:07 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:59:04PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:55:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:07:24AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:36:57AM +1000, Dave
Am 21.03.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:52:23AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>
>> Am 20.03.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Greg KH:
>>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:27:23PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Am 20.03.2016 um 22:41 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:27:23PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>
>> Am 19.03.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Vlastimil Babka:
>>> On 03/17/2016 07:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:38:03PM +0100, Stefan Prieb
Am 19.03.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Vlastimil Babka:
On 03/17/2016 07:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:38:03PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi,
while running qemu 2.5 on a host running 4.4.6 the host system has
crashed
(load > 200) 3 times in the last 3 days.
Always with t
Hi,
while running qemu 2.5 on a host running 4.4.6 the host system has
crashed (load > 200) 3 times in the last 3 days.
Always with this stack trace: (copy left here:
http://pastebin.com/raw/bCWTLKyt)
[69068.874268] divide error: [#1] SMP
[69068.875242] Modules linked in: ebtable_filte
Hi Herbert,
Am 07.12.2015 um 02:20 schrieb Herbert Xu:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:56:34PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Hi Herbert,
>>
>> i think i found the issue in 4.1 with netlink. Somebody made a
>> mistake while backporting or cherry-picking your patch &qu
12PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote:
* 9f87e0c - (2 months ago) netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound
- Herbert Xu
* 35e9890 - (3 months ago) netlink: Fix autobind race condition that
leads to zero port ID - Herbert Xu
* 30c6472 - (7 months ago) netlink: Use random autobind rover - Herbert Xu
These thr
Hello Philipp,
Am 05.12.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Philipp Matthias Hahn:
Hello Hannes,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:40:32PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
git bisect tells me it stopped working after those two commits were applied:
commit d48623677191e0f035d7afd344f92cf880b01f8e
Author: Herbert
) netlink: rename private flags and states -
Nicolas Dichtel
* 0356126 - (2 days ago) Revert "netlink: don't hold mutex in rcu
callback when releasing mmapd ring" - Stefan Priebe
* 231d0da - (2 days ago) Revert "netlink: make sure -EBUSY won't escape
from netlink_insert
> Am 02.12.2015 um 12:40 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa
> :
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG writes:
>
>
>> here are the results.
>>
>> It works with 4.1.
>> It works with 4.2.
>> It does not work with 4.1.13.
>>
:44, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
>>>
>>> Am 19.11.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>>> On 11/19/2015 01:46 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can try Kerne
Am 23.11.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 13:44, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
>>>
>>> Am 19.11.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>>> On 11/19/2015 01:46
Am 19.11.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
>
> Am 19.11.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>> On 11/19/2015 01:46 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>
>>> I can try Kernel 4.4-rc1 next week. Or something else?
>>
>> I found this bug r
Am 19.11.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 11/19/2015 01:46 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
I can try Kernel 4.4-rc1 next week. Or something else?
I found this bug report which indicates that 4.1.10 works:
<https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25251>
Am 19.11.2015 um 13:41 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015, at 12:43, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>
>> Am 19.11.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015, at 10:56, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>>
Am 19.11.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015, at 10:56, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> OK it had a livelock again. It just took more time.
>>
>> So here is the data:
>
> Thanks, I couldn't reproduce it so far with simple
fff8800b16cf000 15 4410001 000 20
1542
8800b1168800 15 4294962900 000 20
7978
8800b7088800 15 0 0000 0 00 20
5
8800b71c9800 16 0 000 20
15
f
Am 19.11.2015 um 10:44 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> On 11/18/2015 10:36 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>
>>> please try to get a backtrace with debugging information. It is likely
>>> that this is the make_request/__check_pf functionality in glibc, but it
>>> wo
Am 18.11.2015 um 22:22 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 22:20, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> you mean just:
>> la /proc/$pid/fd
>
> ls -l /proc/pid/fd/
>
> the numbers in brackets in return from readlink are the inode numbers.
>
>> and
>
Am 18.11.2015 um 22:40 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 22:36, Stefan Priebe wrote:
sorry here it is. What I'm wondering is why is there ipv6 stuff? I don't
have ipv6 except for link local. Could it be this one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Am 18.11.2015 um 22:18 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 11/18/2015 09:23 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
I've now also two gdb backtraces from two crashes:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=yih5jNt8
http://pastebi
Am 18.11.2015 um 22:18 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 11/18/2015 09:23 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
I've now also two gdb backtraces from two crashes:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=yih5jNt8
Am 18.11.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 21:23, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
I've now also two gdb backtraces from two crashes:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=yih
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
I've now also two gdb backtraces from two crashes:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=yih5jNt8
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=kGEcvH4T
They don't tell me anything as I have no idea of the inner w
Am 17.11.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
since Upgrading our Asterisk System from Kernel 3.18.17 to 4.1.13 it
deadlocks every few hours (kill -9 is the only thing working). Booting
with 3.18 again let it run smooth again.
An
Hello,
since Upgrading our Asterisk System from Kernel 3.18.17 to 4.1.13 it
deadlocks every few hours (kill -9 is the only thing working). Booting
with 3.18 again let it run smooth again.
An strace shows asterisk is looping like this:
[pid 6068] timerfd_gettime(8, , {it_interval={0, 2000},
Am 22.07.2015 um 09:23 schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Am 21.07.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 20.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello list,
i've 36 server
Am 21.07.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Am 20.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
>>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>>
>>>> i've
Am 20.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello list,
i've 36 servers all running vanilla 3.18.18 kernel which have a very
high disk and network load.
Since a few days i encounter regular the following error messages and
p
Am 20.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> i've 36 servers all running vanilla 3.18.18 kernel which have a very
>> high disk and network load.
>>
>> Since a few
Hello list,
i've 36 servers all running vanilla 3.18.18 kernel which have a very
high disk and network load.
Since a few days i encounter regular the following error messages and
pretty often completely hanging disk i/o:
[535040.439859] do_IRQ: 0.126 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
[548400.353
Am 05.09.2014 20:33, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:10:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:03 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote:
On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser
wrote:
On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
(from
Am 16.06.2014 23:30, schrieb Francois Romieu:
> Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG :
> [...]
>> That sounds great! Is there anything I can do or some code I can port to
>> veth?
>
> You may add an empty handler for .ndo_poll_controller in drivers/net/veth.c
> and give
> Am 16.06.2014 um 21:12 schrieb Cong Wang :
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.06.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Cong Wang :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
&
> Am 16.06.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Cong Wang :
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.06.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Cong Wang :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>&g
> Am 16.06.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Cong Wang :
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm using a vanilla 3.10.43 kernel and netconsole on top of a bridge.
>>
>> netconsole is used with vmbr0 (bridge
Hi,
i'm using a vanilla 3.10.43 kernel and netconsole on top of a bridge.
netconsole is used with vmbr0 (bridge) which is on top of bond0.
If i want to add another bridge to vmbr0 is fails as long as netconsole
is in use.
# brctl addif vmbr0 fwpr2004p0
can't add fwpr2004p0 to bridge vmbr0: Unkn
Hello list,
while running Qemu 1.7.0 on vanilla kernel 3.10.22 i've seen several
times this error:
[99964.659578] WARNING: at kernel/jump_label.c:80
__static_key_slow_dec+0xb6/0xc0()
[99964.659579] jump label: negative count!
[99964.659579] Modules linked in: sch_htb act_police cls_u32 sch_ing
Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 734a29a..ccc6242 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ sd_store_cache_type(struct device
Hi Ric,
Am 23.11.2013 20:35, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/23/2013 01:27 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Ric,
Am 22.11.2013 21:37, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/22/2013 03:01 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
2. Some drives may implement
Hi Ric,
Am 23.11.2013 20:35, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/23/2013 01:27 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Ric,
Am 22.11.2013 21:37, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/22/2013 03:01 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
2. Some drives may implement
Hi Ric,
Am 22.11.2013 21:37, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/22/2013 03:01 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
2. Some drives may implement CMD_FLUSH to return immediately i.e. no
guarantee the data is actually on disk.
In which case they
Hi Ric,
Am 22.11.2013 21:37, schrieb Ric Wheeler:
On 11/22/2013 03:01 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Christoph,
Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
2. Some drives may implement CMD_FLUSH to return immediately i.e. no
guarantee the data is actually on disk.
In which case they
Hi Christoph,
Am 21.11.2013 11:11, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
2. Some drives may implement CMD_FLUSH to return immediately i.e. no
guarantee the data is actually on disk.
In which case they aren't spec complicant. While I've seen countless
data integrity bugs on lower end ATA SSDs I've not se
Am 20.11.2013 16:55, schrieb J. Bruce Fields:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:37:03AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:52:36PM +0530, Chinmay V S wrote:
If you have confirmed the performance numbers, then it indicates that
the Intel 530 controller is more advanced and makes be
Am 20.11.2013 16:22, schrieb Chinmay V S:
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your great and detailed reply. I'm just wondering why an
intel 520 ssd degrades the speed just by 2% in case of O_SYNC. intel 530
the newer model and replacement for the 520 degrades speed by 75% like
the crucial m4.
The Intel DC
Hi ChinmayVS,
Am 20.11.2013 14:34, schrieb Chinmay V S:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Christoph is bang on right. To further elaborate upon this, here is
> what is happening in the above case :
> By using DIRECT, SYNC/DSYNC flags on a block device (i.e. bypassing
> the file-systems layer), essentially you are
Hello,
while struggling about an application beeing so slow on my SSD and
having high I/O Waits while the app is using the raw block device i've
detected that this is caused by open the block device with O_DSYNC.
I've used dd and fio with oflags=direct,dsync / --direct=1 and --sync=1
and got the
Thanks! No crashes since your fix.
Stefan
This mail was sent with my iPhone.
Am 30.08.2013 um 23:15 schrieb Kent Overstreet :
> GFP_NOIO means we could be getting called recursively - mca_alloc() ->
> mca_data_alloc() - definitely can't use mutex_lock(bucket_lock) then.
> Whoops.
>
> Signed-of
thanks applied to my local kernel git
Stefan
Am 30.08.2013 23:15, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
GFP_NOIO means we could be getting called recursively - mca_alloc() ->
mca_data_alloc() - definitely can't use mutex_lock(bucket_lock) then.
Whoops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet
---
On Thu, Aug 29, 2
sorry seems i see something similiar:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ZqgLf9gp
Stefan
Am 28.08.2013 22:15, schrieb Stefan Priebe:
sorry but that's completely wrong.
please use branch bcache-for-3.10
http://evilpiepirate.org/git/linux-bcache.git/log/?h=bcache-for-3.10
Stefan
Am 28.08.20
sorry but that's completely wrong.
please use branch bcache-for-3.10
http://evilpiepirate.org/git/linux-bcache.git/log/?h=bcache-for-3.10
Stefan
Am 28.08.2013 22:12, schrieb kernel neophyte:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 28.08.2013 20:47, schrieb kernel neo
Am 28.08.2013 20:47, schrieb kernel neophyte:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
I don't had one for a few days. Which kernel so you use?
3.10 kernel with all of kent's stable patches and perf patches..
Which exact 3.10 version? Which patc
2522.956977] 882fa6aeb320 882f8ec94cb0 00020003
>>> 882f8ec94cb0
>>> [ 2522.956981] Call Trace:
>>> [ 2522.956987] [] schedule+0x29/0x70
>>> [ 2522.956992] [] rwsem_down_read_failed+0x9d/0xe5
>>> [ 2522.956997] [] call_rwsem_down_r
[] __sync_filesystem+0x4a/0x50
2013-08-26 21:05:27 [] sync_filesystem+0x32/0x60
2013-08-26 21:05:27 [] SyS_syncfs+0x50/0x90
2013-08-26 21:05:27 [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
2013-08-26 21:05:27 INFO: task ceph-osd:8798 blocked for more than
120 seconds.
Stefan
Am 22.08.2013 09:32, schri
great!
Everything seems to work fine now! Except read_dirty always going to
negative values after a reboot.
Stefan
Am 22.08.2013 08:02, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 07:59:04AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>
>>> schedule_timeout()
>schedule_timeout() is not the same as
>schedule_timeout_interruptible().
just search and replace? So i can try on my own.
Stefan
Am 22.08.2013 07:43, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 07:27:12AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
today i had this one:
Heh, I finally trac
he]
2013-08-22 06:28:43 []
bch_insert_data_loop+0xf8/0x610 [bcache]
2013-08-22 06:28:43 [] ?
bch_get_congested+0x25/0x70 [bcache]
2013-08-22 06:28:43 [] bch_insert_data+0x1d/0x20
[bcache]
2013-08-22 06:28:43 [] closure_queue+0x43/0x60
[bcache]
2013-08-22 06:28:43 [] request_wr
Am 22.08.2013 01:47, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 20.08.2013 10:01, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Am 20.08.2013 00:27, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:09:24AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote
Am 20.08.2013 10:01, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Am 20.08.2013 00:27, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:09:24AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>>
>>> Vanilla 3.10.7 + bcache: Fix a writeback performance regression
>>>
>&g
Am 20.08.2013 00:27, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:09:24AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>>
>> Vanilla 3.10.7 + bcache: Fix a writeback performance regression
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=LXZk4cMH
>
> Whoops, at first I thought this wa
Vanilla 3.10.7 + bcache: Fix a writeback performance regression
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=LXZk4cMH
Stefan
Am 16.08.2013 12:11, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Hi,
bcache: Fix a writeback performance regression
this one results in 3.10 into hung tasks in bcache_writeback
Hi,
bcache: Fix a writeback performance regression
this one results in 3.10 into hung tasks in bcache_writeback read_dirty.
Stefan
Am 15.08.2013 08:43, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
> Am 15.08.2013 00:59, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
>> Jens, here's the latest bcache fixe
Am 15.08.2013 00:59, schrieb Kent Overstreet:
> Jens, here's the latest bcache fixes. Some urgent stuff in here:
>
>
> The following changes since commit 79826c35eb99cd3c0873b8396f45fa26c87fb0b0:
>
> bcache: Allocation kthread fixes (2013-07-12 00:22:49 -0700)
>
> are available in the git rep
Hello list,
today i kvm host crashed running vanilla kernel 3.8.9.
The call trace looks like this:
Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 18
Pid: 29053, comm: kvm Tainted: G O 3.8.9+16-ph #1
Call Trace:
[] panic+0xbf/0x1df
[] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
[] watchdog_o
then the
bridge on top of the VLANs.
Greets,
Stefan
Am 07.02.2013 12:22, schrieb Patrick McHardy:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:56:38AM +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> this was tested using vanilla 3.7.6 kernel.
>>
>> When i add a vlan to
ah OK - thanks. Will there be a fixed 1.1.2 as well?
Stefan
Am 08.08.2012 10:06, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 07:51:07AM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Any news? Was this applied upstream?
Kevin is ill. He has asked me to review and test patches in his
absence. When he
Any news? Was this applied upstream?
Am 06.08.2012 14:37, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/06/2012 03:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/06/2012 11:46 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But still i got the segfault and core dump - this is my main problem? I
mean qemu-kvm master isn't declar
can confirm - this fixed it!
Am 06.08.2012 14:37, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/06/2012 03:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/06/2012 11:46 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But still i got the segfault and core dump - this is my main problem? I
mean qemu-kvm master isn't declared as stabl
>Am 06.08.2012 10:36, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/05/2012 10:00 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
So here are 3 backtraces from booting the rescue system:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xCy2pEcP
To me they all look the same.
They are. What version of qemu are you using?
latest stable-1.1 bra
Am 05.08.2012 17:52, schrieb Stefan Priebe:
Am 05.08.2012 12:29, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/05/2012 01:08 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:53, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/01/2012 12:42 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Avi Kivity:
So here are 3
Am 05.08.2012 12:29, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/05/2012 01:08 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:53, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/01/2012 12:42 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Avi Kivity:
So here are 3 backtraces from booting the rescue system:
http
Am 01.08.2012 11:53, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/01/2012 12:42 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Avi Kivity:
So here are 3 backtraces from booting the rescue system:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xCy2pEcP
To me they all look the same.
They are. What version
Am 01.08.2012 11:53, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 08/01/2012 12:42 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 01.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Avi Kivity:
So here are 3 backtraces from booting the rescue system:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xCy2pEcP
To me they all look the same.
They are. What version
Am 01.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Avi Kivity:
So here are 3 backtraces from booting the rescue system:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xCy2pEcP
To me they all look the same.
They are. What version of qemu are you using?
latest stable-1.1 branch (1.1.1) - which works fine with latest RHEL6
kernel.
, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Now i got it working - sorry used old gdb.
This is the backtrace:
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -id 103 -chardev
socket,id=qmp,path=/var/run/qemu-s'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7f6ca10faed8 in ?? () from /lib/libc
Am 31.07.2012 16:54, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 07/31/2012 02:59 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello list,
i hope it is correct to list the maintainers of kvm. While trying to
install ubuntu 12.04 amd64 on a kvm based vm the KVM process segfaults
while ubuntu tries to detect the HW:
kvm
Now i got it working - sorry used old gdb.
This is the backtrace:
Core was generated by `/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -id 103 -chardev
socket,id=qmp,path=/var/run/qemu-s'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7f6ca10faed8 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0
Hello list,
i hope it is correct to list the maintainers of kvm. While trying to
install ubuntu 12.04 amd64 on a kvm based vm the KVM process segfaults
while ubuntu tries to detect the HW:
kvm[2978]: segfault at 7fb90d9035e0 ip 7fb90d9035e0
sp7fff652e4ed8 error 15
This does not happe
the moment.
Stefan
Jiri Slaby schrieb:
Stefan Priebe - allied internet ag napsal(a):
Hello!
I've done the (echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger) now but i'm not able to get
the whole output via dmesg.
Here is what i get:
# dmesg
3.432124] [] do_select+0x390/0x46e
[272363.432226]
Hello!
I've done the (echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger) now but i'm not able to get
the whole output via dmesg.
Here is what i get:
# dmesg
3.432124] [] do_select+0x390/0x46e
[272363.432226] [] __pollwait+0x0/0xcf
[272363.432319] [] default_wake_function+0x0/0x8
[272363.432416] [] default_wake
307812] [] __do_softirq+0x72/0xdf
[267457.307874] [] do_softirq+0x37/0x39
[267457.307932] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5a/0x85
[267457.308015] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30
[267457.308083] [] qword_get+0x14d/0x27c
[267457.308161] ===
--
Regards,
Stefan Priebe
--
To unsubscrib
>> One week ago we upgraded about 300 servers from 2.6.20.20 to 2.6.24.2.
>
> Painfull.
OK not really - i've tested the new kernel on all models. And it works
fine... the DN state only comes sometimes - absolutely not reproducable.
So my tests went OK and then we've done the update. I've now se
Hello!
One week ago we upgraded about 300 servers from 2.6.20.20 to 2.6.24.2.
Now we get sometimes dozent of processes in state DN. The system is
completely idle - but the load is 20 or 90 or whatever. And it can only
be "repaired" by rebooting the system.
I'm NOT on the LIST so please CC me
Hello!
I've tested this patch now - and it works fine. Now rmmod, halt and
reboot also works.
Stefan Priebe
Boaz Harrosh schrieb:
gdth _exit would first remove all cards then stop the timer
and would not sync with the timer function. This caused a crash
in gdth_timer() when modul
Hello!
With the sysrq i've found the function with is the problem:
inode.c => nfs_getattr => nfs_sync_mapping_range
I've also found the attached patch - which is not included in any stable
release nor in 2.6.21.X but is public since 20.02.07
I think this is very important
0046 c03be392 c317bfc4 0046 0086 c313fee8
0002 c312f560 kthread+0x72/0x96
002e schedule_timeout+0x70/0x8d
0082 prep_new_page+0xb2/0xea
[] inet_csk_accept+0x51/0x125
Stefan
Olaf Kirch schrieb:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:59, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Kernel command
Kirch schrieb:
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:33, Stefan Priebe wrote:
1.) I've bootet these systems through NFS and would like to access
/dev/sda or /dev/sdb then. For example via fdisk and this does not work.
What do you mean by "booted through NFS"? Do you mean the machine
run
Hello!
It runs with nfsroot
# mount
192.168.0.100:/PXE/debian on / type nfs (rw)
Kernel command line: nfs root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=192.168.0.100:/PXE/debian
ip=dhcp
Stefan
Olaf Kirch schrieb:
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:33, Stefan Priebe wrote:
1.) I've bootet these systems through NF
i also can fdisk /dev/sdb or so. It only does not work if the
system itself is bootet via NFS...
Stefan
Andrew Morton schrieb:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:50:46 +0100 Stefan Priebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
We've a very strange Problem with Kernel 2.6.20.x
If i try to access a SCSI
Hello!
We've a very strange Problem with Kernel 2.6.20.x
If i try to access a SCSI or SATA Disk (tested with Adaptec U320
ASC-29320, ICP Vortex 9024, Promise TX300) the whole server hangs - no
output - no error on the screen - but it hangs completely. But it does
not happen on all our systems
Hi!
Any News?
Stefan
Stefan Priebe - FH schrieb:
Hi!
acpi=off does not help i've already tried that.
Ok here some outputs:
1.) complete dmesg with 2.6.16.27 (works)
Linux version 2.6.16.27amd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5
(Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #6 SMP Sat Aug 26 14:29:07 CEST
Hi!
Any News?
Stefan
Stefan Priebe - FH schrieb:
Hi!
OK - i rechecked everything. We've 22 Servers with the DFI PM-12
Mainboard with VIA Chipset.
But only the 5 oldest of them (before 2004 / 01 / 20) (we've buyed all
in a range of 10 month) have this problem.
So i think it is
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
