Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: introduce two new ioctls

On 24.06.2013 13:36, Namjae Jeon wrote: > Currently, we can try implementing dave's suggesstion of introducing a > new flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE for falloctae instead of individual > ioctls for both XFS and EXT4. Thanks. Hi, Currently PUNCH_HOLE requires KEEP_SIZE to be set as well. I think t

Re: EXT4 panic at jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in 3.9+

Hi, Bitfields are likely to be implemented using read-modify-write semantics. Modifications of either b_jlist or b_jmodified must be done under lock since they share same uint. I guess this lock is missing somewhere. Regards, Andrei. On 12.05.2013 20:07, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 20