Re: [PATCH] HID: intel-ish-hid: ipc: Add Tiger Lake H PCI device ID

2021-02-04 Thread You-Sheng Yang
On 2/4/21 11:13 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 16:33 +0800, You-Sheng Yang wrote: >> Added Tiger Lake H PCI device ID to the supported device list. >> >> Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang > Did you get chance to verify on a platform? > Do you see sen

[PATCH] HID: intel-ish-hid: ipc: Add Tiger Lake H PCI device ID

2021-02-04 Thread You-Sheng Yang
Added Tiger Lake H PCI device ID to the supported device list. Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang --- drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/hw-ish.h | 1 + drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/hw-ish.h b/drivers/hid

iwlwifi may wrongly cast a iwl_cfg_trans_params to iwl_cfg

2021-01-21 Thread You-Sheng Yang
ot;, pure garbage data. So is there something missed in the iwl_dev_info_table, or better, just find another solid safe way to handle such trans/cfg mix? Regards, You-Sheng Yang

Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: fw: don't send GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command to FW version 29

2019-10-08 Thread You-Sheng Yang
Tested and commented on the issue page. Thank you for the correction. -- Cheers, You-Sheng Yang On 2019-10-08 15:17, Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 14:05 +0800, You-Sheng Yang wrote: >> Follow-up for commit fddbfeece9c7 ("iwlwifi: fw: don't send >> GEO_TX_

[PATCH] iwlwifi: fw: don't send GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command to FW version 29

2019-10-07 Thread You-Sheng Yang
Follow-up for commit fddbfeece9c7 ("iwlwifi: fw: don't send GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command to FW version 36"). There is no GEO_TX_POWER_LIMIT command support for all revisions of FW version 29, either. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 0/2] HID: i2c-hid: add 60ms SET_POWER delay for Goodix touchpad

2019-09-25 Thread You-Sheng Yang
ions to the HOST > specified Power State in under 1 second. it can take as long as 1 second. This changeset add a device property post-setpower-delay-ms and use it to specify the delay after a SET_POWER command is issued for this device. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20

[PATCH 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: add 60ms SET_POWER delay for Goodix touchpad

2019-09-25 Thread You-Sheng Yang
post-setpower-delay-ms. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204991 Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang --- drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c

[PATCH 1/2] HID: i2c-hid: allow delay after SET_POWER

2019-09-25 Thread You-Sheng Yang
and leaves the device in an unsupported Mouse mode. This change adds a post-setpower-delay-ms device property that allows specifying the delay after a SET_POWER command is issued. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204991 Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang --- .../bindings/input

Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable on CoffeeLake

2019-04-11 Thread You-Sheng Yang
On 2019/4/8 8:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, You-Sheng Yang wrote: >> +/* >> + * On Intel CoffeeLake, tsc may be marked unstable unexpectedly after >> + * entering PC10. >> + */ >> +if (boot_cpu_da

Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable on CoffeeLake

2019-04-10 Thread You-Sheng Yang
On 2019/4/8 8:03 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, You-Sheng Yang wrote: > >> From: You-Sheng Yang >> >> On Intel CoffeeLake it's observed tsc is always marked unstable >> unexpectedly after entering idle state Package C10(PC10), and then clock

[PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable on CoffeeLake

2019-04-08 Thread You-Sheng Yang
From: You-Sheng Yang On Intel CoffeeLake it's observed tsc is always marked unstable unexpectedly after entering idle state Package C10(PC10), and then clock source is switched to hpet. This patch marks tsc as reliable when CPUID matches CoffeeLake. Link: https://bugzilla.kerne

Re: [PATCH v4 18/21] fuse: Add support for pid namespaces

2016-07-20 Thread Sheng Yang
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 07:44:11PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Seth Forshee >> wrote: >> > When the userspace process servicing fuse requests is running in >> > a pid namesp

Re: [PATCH v4 18/21] fuse: Add support for pid namespaces

2016-07-19 Thread Sheng Yang
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > When the userspace process servicing fuse requests is running in > a pid namespace then pids passed via the fuse fd are not being > translated into that process' namespace. Translation is necessary > for the pid to be useful to that process.

Re: [PATCH] tcm_loop: Show address of tpg in configfs

2015-10-27 Thread Sheng Yang
Anyone interested in TCM loopback device? --Sheng On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > In the past, the scsi_host's number wasn't shown anywhere, user have to > depends on vpg_83 to find the block device, which is also depends on > backstore implementation.

Re: [Nbd] NBD: Disconnect connection/kill NBD server cause kernel bug even kernel hang

2015-09-21 Thread Sheng Yang
; > http://sourceforge.net/p/nbd/mailman/nbd-general/thread/20131114075827.GA13554%40quack.suse.cz/#msg31636917 > > Maybe Markus has some thoughts on how to fix it. I think there are a couple > options. > > -- > Paul > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Sheng Yang wrot

Re: [Nbd] NBD: Disconnect connection/kill NBD server cause kernel bug even kernel hang

2015-09-21 Thread Sheng Yang
_sb_start_write+0xec/0x100 [ 240.366119] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){..}, at: [] ext4_file_write_iter+0x18f/0x420 --Sheng On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > [linux-kernel CC dropped, since this is irrelevant for them] > > On Wed,

NBD: Disconnect connection/kill NBD server cause kernel bug even kernel hang

2015-09-16 Thread Sheng Yang
Hi, Markus, I've experienced kernel bug and system hang regarding using nbd-client/server on the same machine. Kernel verison is v4.2. I know http://nbd.sourceforge.net/ said: "Please note that read-write nbd with client and server on the same machine is a bad idea: expect deadlock within seconds

Re: [RFC PATCH]Multi-threaded Initcall with dependence support

2007-06-03 Thread Sheng Yang
On Friday 01 June 2007 04:26, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:47:53AM +0800, Yang Sheng wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 May 2007 06:52, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 May 2007 15:03:10 +0800 Yang Sheng wrote: > > > > Why we need this: > > > > > > > > It can speed up the calling o